3rd Umpire

Check out today's Daily Deals on eBay.co.uk!

Community Quote

I cannot see the problem in letting some LBW decisions go to the third umpire. There have been very few wrong decisions since run outs could be referred to a third umpire. The act of making the decision whether there is an LBW is incredibly difficult. There are so many factors to take into ... Read review

User reviews »

Community Level 2chrisc559

chrisc559

Why not?

AdvantagesCut out 'bad' decisions, takes pressure off umpires

DisadvantagesRelying too much on technology, slow the game even more?

"I cannot see the problem in letting some LBW decisions go to the third umpire. There have been very few wrong decisions since run outs could be referred to a third umpire. The act of making the decision whether there is an LBW is incredibly difficult. There are so many factors to take into consideration, umpires need all the help they can get. People give umpires a hard time for making ‘bad’ decisions when the people complaining have seen endless ..." Read review
04.09.2000

Ciao members have rated this review on average: helpful

Show all 1 reviews

Compare similar topics to 3rd Umpire »

Better coverage and highlights are better
Cricket does swap for horse racing (*)
Sex it up like tennis girls
Low standard (*)
Another aesy win for the Poms!
Oz are very poor (*)
Great arena
Expensive (*)
T20 cricket is exciting
Test cricket can be boring (*)
The series is being played
England are getting stuffed! (*)
Dennis Wise could be out LBW with his head
Beckham might not be able to pout on cricket pads (too complex) (*)
Not too energetic
Boring, Too Long, Pointless. (*)
Strong Batting
Weak bowling attack (*)
none
Its played by woosies!!! (*)
Good Indian side
England getting old (*)
Gives English cricket an extra buzz
none (*)
Helped bowling attack
Keeping batsman out of form (*)
Brings youngsters and helps England understand foreigners more
Too many games. (*)
(*) Reviews by Ciao members