Home > Books > Plays > A Plays
Antony and Cleopatra - Tragedy or not 7 of 7 Ciao Users found the following review helpful
Rating from robscott 5 Stars ()

Advantages This is one of Shakespeares first efforts at tragedy and makes us question whether or not we pity the hero.

Disadvantages It is unclear whether or not Shakespeare wanted us to experience feelings of katharsis when seeing Antony's actions.

In classical terms, a play must have certain features for it to be a tragedy. This is called “tragic theory”. Tragic theory dictates that, in order for a play to be a tragedy, it must fulfil specific criteria. There must be a tragic hero; somebody who has great reputation or prosperity. This tragic hero is to some degree responsible for his own demise; he makes an error of judgement, a tragic flaw. However, this is also seen as inevitable, he is seen as destined to this tragic end. Is Marc Antony a tragic hero? Are we, when watching the play left with the feelings (pity and fear) that are associated with a tragedy? Does “Antony and Cleopatra” have tragic effect?

We hear about Mark Antony very early in the play; in the first scene Philo’s opening speech tells us how Antony is and has been:

Philo: Nay, but this dotage of our general’s
O’erflows the measure. Those his goodly eyes,
That o’er the files and musters of the war
Have glowed like plated mars, now bend, now turn
The office and devotion of their view
Upon a tawny front….

This is the opening passage of the play and, already, it shows Antony has tragic potential. He has been great - Philo is almost making him out to have been god like. This deification shows us that Antony was a man of extremely high reputation. However, his speech also tells us that Antony is falling from greatness, by saying that he is becoming besotted with a woman - Cleopatra. This makes Antony out to be a tragic hero right from the outset. It also makes a suggestion as to what his tragic flaw is - Cleopatra or, rather, his infatuation with her. This opening is a kind of preparation for what is to come in the play, not unlike the opening lines of “Romeo and Juliet”.

Although we have seen that Antony has tragic qualities from the very beginning, we also understand that fate has an important role to play in his demise. Antony is destined to fall from greatness and, even though we have seen Antony’s tragic flaw, there is a feeling that Antony’s future is somehow preordained. This is shown in III. xiii. 173, where Antony says, “I will oppose his (Caesar’s) fate” This shows that Antony believes that Caesar somehow has luck on his side and that Antony is seeking to overrule this destiny. Another example of Antony’s belief that Octavius Caesar has all of the luck is shown when he consults the Soothsayer (II. iii. 10-39) who tells him that Caesar has infinitely more luck than Antony:

Soothsayer: If thou dost play him (Caesar) at any game,
Thou art sure to lose; and of that natural luck
He beats thee ‘gainst the odds…

After this Antony makes a very interesting speech (II. iii. 32-39), which shows us that he already knew Caesar had luck on his side: He says, “He (the soothsayer) hath spoken true.” He continues to verify the point by showing how bad this is for him:
Antony: If we draw lots, he speeds (wins);
His cocks do win the battle still of mine
When all is to naught, and his quails ever
Beat mine, inhooped, at odds.

This speech endears Antony to us; we see how futile he must feel by fighting against Caesar and this incredible luck that he seems to have.

Detailed Rating

Would you read it again?
Story
Characters
Readability
How does it compare to similar works?
How does it compare to works by the same author?

The Author

robscott

Author's newest reviews

Rate this User Review

How helpful was this review to you? Rating guidelines

Attention, this is the first review from this author

Instead of giving a negative rating, consider:

  • Help this member by giving your advice

  • Report fraud (for example plagiarism) or other issue with the review to the Ciao support team

Activate low rating buttons

Add your comment

 Post comment  Post comment

JavaScript should be enabled to rate or post a comment.

Comments

Maybe you have a question about Antony and Cleopatra - William Shakespeare? Ask here
Previous page Next page Page 1 of 2 | 1 - 5 out of 7 comments
  • arbie 12/10/2004 19:31
    Rated this review as
    Very Helpful
  • eeeekkk 23/08/2001 10:52
    Rated this review as
    Helpful
  • chicane 23/08/2001 10:26
    Rated this review as
    Helpful

    i'm sorry but i have to comment! although the chronology of shakespeare's plays is by no means certain it is generally accepted that Anthony and Cleopatra was written around 1608 AFTER Macbeth, Hamlet and King Lear all accepted as great tragedies therefore Anthony and Cleopatra is hardly the first outing in tragedy for Shakespeare that you suggest (perhaps you know something i dont?). Also the play is called Anthony and CLEOPATRA indicating not a single protagonist but a playing around by shakespeare with the theory of tragedy, with the role of hero, as Cleopatra is equally as tragic as Anthony so to ignore her in your op is missing half the play (in my opinion). sorry to be so critical but i love shakespeare and hate to see him portrayed falsely (which you only do in part) i like the bit at the end though about triumph and tragedy, that was very good and VH - sam

  • seagulls-lost-horizon 23/08/2001 01:42
    Rated this review as
    Very Helpful
  • Boris 22/08/2001 23:56
    Rated this review as
    Very Helpful
Previous page Next page Page 1 of 2 | 1 - 5 out of 7 comments

More reviews

for Antony and Cleopatra - William Shakespeare

Compare prices

for Antony and Cleopatra - William Shakespeare