Saturn 5


Add to my Circle of Trust

Subscribe to reviews

About me:

Member since:21.06.2000


Members who trust:27


Built like a brick shi...

25.10.2001 (28.11.2001)

Built like the proverbial outhouse .  Indestructable .

Built like the proverbial outhouse .  Damn heavy .

Recommendable Yes:

Detailed rating:

Picture Quality

Range & Quality of Features

Ease of Use

Overall Look & Design

Value for Money



WeightVery Heavy

Compatibility with other Photographic EquipmentGood


Instruction ManualExcellent

13 Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful See ratings
very helpful by (100%):
  1. Nige7Whit
  2. Dudler
  3. Antigone
and 22 other members

View all ratings

The overall rating of a review is different from a simple average of all individual ratings.

Share this review on

I bought my Canon T90 fifteen years ago to take on holiday and dropped it of a moving taxi on about the third roll of film. It is still going strong. In that time my wife has worn out three identical Minoltas of a slightly lower spec and she treats them pretty well.

I won't go into the spec in too much detail. Its an SLR camera, down to 1/4000 shutter speed, single or multi-spot metering, no autofocus, integral autowind, etc, etc. I saw a slightly worn second hand one today for £225 and a mint one which looked brand new for £425 (Cambridge). It is very heavy with a full load of batteries and also quite noisy, these days, compared to newer cameras.

What I will do is go into the abuse that I have given mine to give you an idea of how hardy it is. The day I bought it the plastic connector for the strap broke so I took it back. Since then, it hasn't needed any work that I couldn't do myself with a jewellers screwdriver. I dropped it out of a moving taxi hard enough to crack the viewfinder but it doesn't seem to have had any effect. Over the years it has had many knocks. It has been on beaches, out in the rain, up mountains in Alaska, baked in the sun and sat on glaciers. My only complaint is that the lens mount tends to come loose. Then again, I do use heavy lenses. It is possible to remove the front panel and fix this quite quickly but I wouldn't advise it. I lost the spring out of the latch for the back that way, but it still works. There is, I think, a lot of redundancy in this camera.

One Christmas a Tamron Adaptall mount broke and stuck onto the mount. Under the influence of the Christmas spirit I decided that I had to take it off with a hacksaw. The Canon body stood up to that quite well too, though it took ages to get the bits of aluminium out afterwards. I had to replace the eyepiece about three times and then gave up and have done without for years.

I have to say that I do not keep the camera clean, so bits of all kinds of rubbish must have gotten into the mechanism but it is still extremely smooth. The metering and shuttering is still pretty accurate, although knowing a camera well you tend to compensate for exposure foibles sometimes without thinking.

Over the years I have assembled quite a lot of dedicated accessories. The dedicated flashgun still works perfectly and I still don't know how all of the functions work. The infra-red remote control is also extremely reliable although I have never used the wildlife/trip functions, so I can't say how well that works.

It has, sad to say, outlasted me. Manual focussing is now such a chore, and my eyes so dodgy (relatively speaking) that I feel the need to 'go autofocus'. All in all, I would say that this is the most reliable thing that I have ever owned.

  Write your own review

Share this review on

  Next review »

Rate this review »

How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines

Rate as exceptional

Rate as somewhat helpful

Rate as very helpful

Rate as not helpful

Rate as helpful

Rate as off topic

Write your own review Write a review and you will earn 0.5p per rating if other members rate your review at least helpful. Write a review and you will earn 0.5p per rating if other members rate your review at least helpful.   Report a problem with this review’s content

Comments about this review »

Dudler 13.03.2002 21:21

I was lucky enough to borrow one of these fine machines from a friend. I entirely agree with Saturn - it is incredibly solid, and works wonderfully. It's also far too heavy, and you can see why Canon moved on when they went autofocus, and made the EOS series lighter (if not quite so good for smashing rocks with). I'm glad to have used one - and I was delighted to return to my much lighter Contax RTS!

Bigbaz 31.10.2001 23:55

I really dont think that my beloved Pentax would stand up to that kind of abuse..Baz

Sharl 26.10.2001 00:33

They don't make 'em like they used to! Great op. Thanks Sharl

Add your comment

max. 2000 characters

  Post comment

Similar offers for Canon T90 »

1 to 2 out of 2 similar offers for Canon T90
Richard Hunecke Canon T90 (Hove User's Guide)

Richard Hunecke Canon T90 (Hove User's Guide)

Complete guide to Canon T90

 Visit Shop  >
Amazon Marketplace
Postage & Packaging:  refer to website
Availability:  refer to website

More reviews »

Review Ratings »

This review of Canon T90 has been rated:

"very helpful" by (100%):

  1. Nige7Whit
  2. Dudler
  3. Antigone

and 22 other members

The overall rating of a review is different from a simple average of all individual ratings.

Products you might be interested in »

Canon EOS 500 N

Canon EOS 500 N

(+) wonderful for all aspects of photography
(-) none!

User reviews (7)

Buy Now

Canon EOS 300

Canon EOS 300

(+) Light weight and Very Easy To use
(-) None that i have found

User reviews (23)

Buy Now

Canon EOS 50 E

Canon EOS 50 E

Camera, Analogue Cameras - SLR - 135mm - without Zoom - with Built-in Flash - with Red Eye Reduction

User reviews (8)

Buy Now

Are you the manufacturer / provider of Canon T90? Click here