If you go to http://www.extasybooks.com/eb. php3?ebookid=18853 you can have a look at my latest wor...
If you go to http://www.extasybooks.com/eb. php3?ebookid=18853 you can have a look at my latest work.
Member since:21.05.2001
Reviews:417
Members who trust:49
I first learned chess as a child - taught by my father, who as far as I can make out is a pretty good player. I played all the way through school, and was ... passable, never good. I find this game enormously frustrating and to be honest, I don't even like it much. I'm sure I'm not alone, so, anyone else out there who can't play, don't let it make you feel like some sort of intellectual misfit.
Chess works best when the players are of equal apptitude and think in much the same way. I've played with people who are about as good as I am - who can put together a strategy lasting three or four moves, can feint, and disguise attacks a little, and that works just fine. I find playing with people who have been taught is just horrible, (and yes, i do always lose, i generally play to see how long iI can last.)
I married someone who has taken classes
on the art of chess playing, who has learned chess theory, openings, strategies, manouvers and the like. The game is almost like a science, and apparently there is a lot you can learn. He's taught me a great deal, but the more I discover about chess, the less I find I like it. I think it depends a lot on who much you enjoy the notion of working with a large, but not infinite number of variables.
I will share with you a teaching method that Jonathan used to improve my chess. Set up pawns on one side of the board, just pawns. On the other, place a pair of pieces - the rook, the bishops. Work through all of them, excepting the king. The idea is to get a pawn to the far side of the board, or to prevent this. It's a good way of learing how to use the pieces and the board, and it did wonders for me. It's a fascinating exersize, and it does teach you a lot about the game without having to plough through acres of books.
Why don't I like chess? I've been pondering this question for about a year. Technically, I should be bright enough to be able to play it, I can manipulate a reasonable amount of information, I can formulate strategies. I think part of my problem is that playing depends on being able to take in and asses a vast amount of visual information - something I am not so hot at. To play chess well, you must be able to comprehend the board, to look at what is going on and see the relationships between every piece. Each move alters that relationship and changes the possible actions. I will admit, that holding this much visual information in my mind is a struggle as I think predominantly in words. While you can to a certain extent play the person (most people can be unsettled in some way) there is less scope in chess than in many other games. My preference is for larger games with more players, where a combination of competition and assistance is required - chess is entirely confrontational in nature, and this reduces it's appeal for me.
Some variants on a theme of chess, if you want a bit of fun.
Variant one, you take five chessboards, placing four round each side of the fifth. You ahve four players, each with a set of pieces and each starting on a seperate board. The idea is top get everyone else into checkmate. Once you are in checkmate, you cannot move your pieces until or unless another player releases you from the checkmate. It takes a long time, you really do need four sets of pieces that look different, but it's a lot more interesting because you have scope for working with people as well as against them.
Variant two required tree people and two rooms, and three chess boards. Persons one and two have a chess board with two sets of pieces, only one of which is one the board. person three needs a portable set. The two players play blind, moving their pieces out onto the board. person three will tell them if they can't move into a square or if they have taken a piece. I've not tried playing this as it requires a phenomenal skill for holding a map of the board in your head, but I gather from people who have that it is really interesting.
If you hate chess, don't feel that you'r somehow wrong - you aren't alone, and it's not the best game on the face of the planet. It favour a certain style of thought and a good visual memory - not everyone has those. I find the best thing to do is play my husband at scrabble - I might not be the best at spelling, but I understand the board and have a knack for finding good words..... there's always a way o cheering yourself up if you can't play this particular board game, and beign good at chess does not necessarily mean you are any sort of super genius, it jsut means you have the sort of mind that works well for chess.
How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines
A very good op, I like the variants, never heard of any of them beofre. I've given you a VH as it is a good op but I'd really look out for those typos. One paragraph reads you need tree people, where do you get them from?? ;p
TallTone 05.09.2001 12:12
Hi - very good opinion until you rushed the last few paragraphs. Some interesting variants - hadn't heard of the five board one. I'm not a great player but I enjoy a dabble now and then. If you go back and correct the end of the work I'll be happy to give you a VH. Regards, TT.