...
Perhaps considered by many to be the original, archetypal ghost story, Frankenstein or *The Modern Prometheus has become synonymous with mad scientists and evil monsters. This seminal piece of writing has gone on to spawn a thousand imitations, lodging itself very firmly in everyday folklore ... Read review
Advantages: Timeless story, sweeping visualisation Disadvantages: Old vernacular
...the original, archetypal ghost story, Frankenstein or *The Modern Prometheus has become synonymous with mad scientists and evil monsters. This seminal piece of writing has gone on to spawn a thousand imitations, lodging itself very firmly in everyday folklore that has a very special place in the modern day psyche.
I read Frankenstein with the inevitable notion of comparing it to Stoker's Dracula. I have to say that the two books are ... ...today.
With Frankenstein being so well known it's worth giving a brief introduction to its writer - Mary Shelley. Born in 1797, the daughter of William Godwin & Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary went on to become one of the world's most renowned writers. Her parents were both radical writers of their day providing something of an influence to the talented Mary. She met the then unknown, Percy Bysshe Shelley in 1814 with whom she eloped to ... more
Oh well, whilst waiting for a movie cat that will come soon I'm sure, writing an op on "To Kill a Mocking-Bird" (the book) and possibly joining in the ongoing Ciao story thingy, I thought I'd post an op I wrote a while ago but was never really happy with the version that made it to Ciao. One senior member criticised me (quite rightly) for dumbing down the intro by including a reference to a Sister Sledge song. This is the version that should have been posted.
Perhaps considered by many to be the original, archetypal ghost story, Frankenstein or *The Modern Prometheus has become synonymous with mad scientists and evil monsters. This seminal piece of writing has gone on to spawn a thousand imitations, lodging itself very firmly in everyday folklore that has a very special place in the modern day psyche.
I read Frankenstein with the inevitable notion of comparing it to Stoker's Dracula. I have to say that the two books are very different albeit both lit a flame in a literary sense that still burns brightly today.
With Frankenstein being so well known it's worth giving a brief introduction to its writer - Mary Shelley. Born in 1797, the daughter of William Godwin & Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary went on to become one of the world's most renowned writers. Her parents were both radical writers of their day providing something of an influence to the talented Mary. She met the then unknown, Percy Bysshe Shelley in 1814 with whom she eloped to the continent
In 1816, residing on the shores of Lake Geneva, Percy suggested a ghost story competition inspiring Mary to start her original work. Subsequently finished in England, the book was initially met with mixed reviews on its publication. Its interesting to note that most people thought that the book had been written by Percy Shelley following its original publication in 1818 as the author remained anonymous until its second edition in 1823.
So, to the story. Set on a ship sailing in the far north, Captain Walton sends a series of letters to his sister, Margaret back in England. He recounts the strangest of tales as the story unfolds. Surrounded by ice, the ship encounters two men. The first was seen traversing the ice on a sledge pulled by dogs described as "...the shape of a man, but apparently of gigantic stature.." Having lost him on the horizon, a short while later the captain picks up a second man found drifting towards the ship on a make-do boat. Somewhat amazed to find anyone so far north, Captain Walton sits down with the stranger to hear his story. Of course, the stranger is Frankenstein of the book's title.
In a series of broken tales over the course of a week, Frankenstein guides the spellbound captain through a maze of murder and intrigue. Responsible for the creation of a "human being", Frankenstein's experiment with nature backfires creating an abomination that he immediately rejects. The creature leaves its birth site only to come back to pursue its master for a solution to its ills. The two meet up in the shadow of Mount Blanc where the creature re-creates its steps for its master since its "birth", telling him of it's efforts to be accepted by man only for them to be doomed to failure. Subsequent rage and despair had led the creature to murder Frankenstein's young brother as retribution for the indignation felt by its abject rejection at the hands of man. The creature's request is simple - make me a mate and I will disappear from your life forever. Frankenstein initially agrees but then goes back on his word and so releases an explosive chain of events that shake the very foundations of its master's life and the lives of those close to him.
So why is Frankenstein so popular, even now? Well, there is no laboratory scene with weird machines and lightening conductors. The creature itself is only described in the vaguest terms with no real description of how it came about. There are certainly no references to piecing together dead body parts seemingly derived from the infamous Burke and Hare. Needless to say, there has been a great deal of license taken with the story over the years.
In its simplest form; Frankenstein seems to be the age-old struggle of good versus evil. Frankenstein is the good doctor who has made a naïve blunder in his creation whilst the iconic monster is typically repellent with a vicious streak resulting in a trail of destruction. However, as you read Frankenstein you realise the boundaries are far more blurred that at first glance. After all, the creature didn't ask to be created and it was hardly its fault that it came to be known as a daemon. Its motives are simply inclusion, which is one of the most basic forms of human rights. It's hard to decide whether the creature is the aggressor although its appetite for revenge does seem extreme. This conflict of motives is found pivotal at the meeting at Mount Blanc where, having listened to the creature's entreaties, Frankenstein agrees to its creation's argument, determining to make a female companion for the creature. However, he later reneges on the agreement fearing "..a race of devils would be propagated on this Earth..."
Frankenstein's motives can be called into question. Having dabbled with the dark arts, he has toyed with the fabric of nature maybe in the same way that scientists skim the borderline through gene technology. Whilst his whiter than white background paints the image of a conscientious, noble individual, its up to the reader to decide just what the repercussions should be for an excursion into the seemingly taboo world of what amounts to cloning. One of the sadder aspects of the story is the awe in which the creature holds its master. Despite the cruel rejection and revulsion of its creator, Shelley manages to get across a paedic bond that seemingly is only felt by one of the parties. This feeling of denial by its father leaves the reader ponderous towards the way the creature is treated although it's difficult to justify the murderous outpourings that result from its paternal contact.
Frankenstein is a classic, timeless tale that works. Today's reader may find the language a little formal but, of course, this story is nearly 200 years old. For me, I found the description of the surrounding countryside the most alluring aspect of the book. A typical passage would be "....It was nearly noon when I arrived at the top of the ascent. For some time I sat upon the rock that overlooks the sea of ice. A mist covered both that and the surrounding mountains. Presently a breeze dissipated the cloud, and I descended upon the glacier..." This is an example of the imagery used by the author almost certainly inspired by her own first hand view of the beauty of Europe in the 19th Century. Ample opportunity is given for such description as the story sweeps across Europe taking in countries from England to Turkey to the further most reaches north of Archangel. Frankenstein is a tragic tale so be prepared for a litany of agony and despair as the story lurches from one disaster to another. The reader can't help thinking that the antagonists are joined by fate determining their individual destinies at some future point.
Surely, books like Dracula and Frankenstein are essential reading in most people's wish list? You cannot fail to be moved by the passion and guile that these stories represent. Free from the artistic license reigned in their direction over the years, the end result is something groundbreaking in its time but written with a formidable penchant for drama that belongs with the most dramatic of opera. Would I recommend it? To be honest, I can't believe it's taken all this time for me to get around to reading Frankenstein.
Thanks for reading.
Marandina
Note: The version I read was from the Penguin Classics collection and contains: An introduction from Maurice Hindle, notes on the text, suggested further reading and a chronology of Mary Shelley.
Also included is the author's introduction to the standard novels edition (1831), a preface by P.B. Shelley and appendices A - Select collation of the texts of 1831 & 1818), B -"A Fragment" by Lord Byron and C - "The Vampyre: A tale" by Dr John William Polidori.
The actual story is only 202 pages.
ISBN is 0-14-043362-7 and cost £2.99 from WH Smith. You can read the text online for free at http://www.literature.org/authors/shelley-mary/frankenstein/
*In Greek mythology, Prometheus was the Titan who gave fire to man. Prometheus was the wisest of the Titans. His name means 'forethought' and he could predict the future.
Advantages: morally ambiguous characters, relevant and accessible ideas Disadvantages: prose style slightly stilted due to age of novel
...the body count rises and Frankenstein becomes increasingly disturbed by what he has set in motion.
The story has three main sections: the framing device, Frankenstein’s story, and his creation’s story. I found the framing device exceedingly dull, partly because I wanted to get to the main story, but also because it is so uneventful. A captain sets out on a mission across the ocean towards the pole. He writes to his sister about how he has organised ... ...the limited close relationships that Frankenstein possesses.
I was anticipating the ‘making of the monster’ section so much that I almost couldn’t believe my eyes when I realised that it was encapsulated into a few bare lines. Watching extracts from the various films, and reading Philip Pullman’s excellent adaptation for children, had led me to expect a dramatic, atmospheric scene which would live in my memory for weeks. Instead, the whole focus ...
brokenangelkisses 14.06.2009
· Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful Review of Frankenstein - Mary Shelley
Advantages: Good classic literature, not too long, still relevant Disadvantages: Not the easiest read
...stars) ************************************************** Frankenstein (who is the man, not the monster) was brought up in Geneva and went to university in Ingolstadt. Fascinated with science, he learned quickly and soon realised he could create life. He’s so enthusiastic that he sets about this project without considering the consequences, and he creates a ‘monster’ from bits of corpses. On completion of his project, he realises how horrific it ... ...out of revenge. Frankenstein realises what has happened, and is troubled by the monstrosity he has released on the world. When he gets a chance to confront his creation, however, he hears its plight. The monster pleads to have a bride to alleviate his loneliness and promises to then avoid human civilisation and live in peace. At first, Frankenstein is won over, and begins work anew. Then, stirred by his conscience, he refuses to create another monster ...
a-true-ben 26.03.2003
· Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful Review of Frankenstein - Mary Shelley
Advantages: A cornerstone of literature as we know it, and a profoundly satisfying read in it's own right. Puts the speculative in 'speculative fiction'. Disadvantages: The pacing may not suit the modern reader, but Shelley's novel is far easier to adjust to in this regard than many of her contemporaries.
...they rescue one Victor von Frankenstein where he is freezing on a lone boat. In gratitude for the service, and as a warning to the captain, Victor recounts the tale of how he got there, and what he is pursuing.
As a young man, Frankenstein had obsessed about the reanimation of the dead. Why should the dead stop moving, stop thinking and feeling? Could they be brought back? Ostracised at University for the morbid nature of his experiments, Frankenstein ... ...it is known throughout - Frankenstein is the man, not the monster) flees in terror and pain. While Victor seems to finally set his obsession to rest after this partial success, the creature elsewhere learns language, a taste of companionship, and what it is to be an outcast feared for its appearance. Eventually it discovers such a wealth of misery that it vows vengeance on its creator for bringing it to being, and seeks him out. Hunting Victor down, ...
RichardW 15.02.2001 (16.02.2001)
· Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful Review of Frankenstein - Mary Shelley
Advantages: Spellbinding gothic horror, great descriptive prose Disadvantages: Alot of coincidences, seems to be missing sequences
...the horrors experienced by Dr. Frankenstein after he disobeys the natural order of things by creating his "monster". Frankenstein recoils in horror at what he has created, and it is his own personal hell that the reader experiences, rather than the terror of the creature himself. Everyone knows the tale of Dr. Frankenstein creating human life in his laboratory, so to go into the plot details seems a bit redundant to me. you'll just have to read the ... ...his lessons in humanity. While Frankenstein chases the monster through the Arctic chill, I felt almost physically cold. You can breathe the scent of the pine trees surrounding Frankenstein's residence as well.
Beyond the excellent descriptions of places and things, Shelley has gifts when it comes to relating suspenseful horror through the eyes of the monster as well as Frankenstein. The doctor comes across like a desperate, oppressed soul, fleeing ...
President-X-D 24.03.2003
· Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful Review of Frankenstein - Mary Shelley
Advantages: A classic story that will live on for generations Disadvantages: Can be a little drawn out by todays standards
...almost every level. Frankenstein is another of those stories that is regularly dragged out for an airing by countless authors and film makers, and each time they should realise that a work like this cannot be recreated. No actor could do justice to the tortured mind of Victor Frankenstein, or the tortured soul of the creature itself.
I'm sure that 99.9% of the population know the basis of the story, but as this is a book review it's probably a good ... ...story to the captain...
Frankenstein was a very talented young doctor, but while he was studying harboured an incessant desire to push the boundaries of death. This slowly takes over his existence, and using the bodyparts of the dead, Victor eventually manages to reanimate the corpse into something resembling life. The creature flees after turning on Victor and seeing the error of his ways, and not entirely expecting the creature to live, Dr. Frankenstein ...
daddycash 07.05.2003
· Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful Review of Frankenstein - Mary Shelley
Would you read it again?
Story
Characters
Readability
How does it compare to ...
How does it compare to ...
Similar reviews »
Reviews which might be of interest for "Frankenstein - Mary Shelley"
Advantages: A great read, communicates it's message with linguistic brilliance Disadvantages: Dated language may be difficult for some
MaryShelley's Frankenstein explores the idea of the 'creation of life'. The idea of Frankenstein seems to show how man can go too far in his exploration of what constitutes 'life'.Frankenstein' raises the never-ending question of how far is too far in relation to medicine. Frankenstein's monster is in effect a load of body parts put together to form a new being and I'm sure nearly everybody finds the idea of this utterly horrific though nowadays in medicine it is routine procedure to transplant organs from people dead and alive to others... something to think about.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
------------------------------------------------- ------------
MaryShelley was subject to many a philosophical discussion about the meaning of life and the many great medical advances of the time as her father was a philosopher; this also meant she was ...
Advantages: beautiful writing and art Disadvantages: you have to concentrate a bit harder
on her way back to Ezequiel's castle.
1. The Venetian Fairy - Favole returns to venice where she meets Sacha, a little boy who loves Favole. She decides to leave Venice and go in search of Ezequiel's castle.
2. The Cauldron - Ebony is a witch who was expelled from her village, and now she lives in the forest. She wants revenge on the people that cast her out and when Favole comes her way she might be able to get it.
3. Necross - Favole is tired from her travels and falls asleep. She wakes up in a mysterious castle that belongs to Abel. He is the son of Marquise, one of the victims of Ezequiel in the first book. Favole asks him to help her find the Castle.
There is an unexpected twist at the end of this story, actually there are alot of twists.
Frances Includes quotes from MaryShelleys, Frankenstein and Officium Defunctorium which ...
If you are a fan of MaryShelley?s ?Frankenstein? or indeed of any horror literature this is the centre piece of any book collection. In recent years there have been very good film version of this book which have made it more accessible and popular. In fact the film with Keanu Reeves, which I saw before reading this book, actually ruined the book for me as it was so good and fairly accurate. This book, though, is not easy to read. It is a collection of journals, diaries and gazettes which present different view points unsettling the reader and not allowing him to take up an Olympian position. It is one of the true scary books of literary history. ...