YAY! I'm actually doing PPE at Oxford --> it's great with tons of familiar faces too. I came to C...
YAY! I'm actually doing PPE at Oxford --> it's great with tons of familiar faces too. I came to Ciao as I love all things tech related and reviewing them. All my reviews are posted at my site at www.cahtech.co.uk.
Member since:12.05.2004
Reviews:16
Members who trust:14
~~~~~~~~Intro~~~~~~~~ To follow on from my review of the fastest ADSL service in the UK, I decided to write a review of the biggest (and potentially fastest) mail service on the internet. Yes, I am talking about Gmail, the exclusive beta mail system from Google which is under testing and gives a whopping 1GB of space to its users.
As the marketing proudly informs me, I will never have to delete another email again, and I will always have my information ready at my finger tips with a quick search should I want to dig something up.
~~~~~~~~Specs.+ Features~~~~~~~~ So, what do you get? The biggest feature is the 1000MB mailbox limit. For years people using webmail services have been limited to 2MB, or maybe a genereous 4MB, with UK services giving 6 or 10MB. Now however, firms have realised that storage is getting ridiculously cheap in comparison to what it was only 3 years ago and so have been able to expand their ageing infrastructures.
What have been the results? Yahoo upped their service to 100MB with a 10MB message limit. Hotmail is about to up the ante to 250MB and I would assume the same message limit. The beauty about these services is that they already exist and you can use them. Gmail is technically not available and so you must be invited. To surpass its rivals Google provides several key features beyond the storage.
The first is the ability to search through your mail easily and effectively. Using the google search system that indexes and analyses your mail you get the google search engine's full capabilities, and ranking facilities applied to every piece of your mail. Some people have found exception with the possibility of abuse of this system in data mining and information leeching. If you feel that way, then don't use the service when it becomes avaialble. However, considering how weak mail security is, and how many servers your messages go across it really does not represent anything to worry about.
Mail and SMTP was designed when everyone on the internet knew eachother, and it was a small community of professors and students who trusted eachother. The same is not
true today and yet people send their mail unencrypted through multiple servers. Google scanning the messages and providing an indexing service will change little to the security of what you send via email. Furthermore, with the recent wiretap ruling in the US declaring that mail messages must be 'tappable' and freely available to security agencies your mail is vulnerable anywhere.
Another noteworthy features is the fact that you can happily use keyboard shortcuts to make everything happen that little bit quicker. That is whether you want to change the status of a message, mark it as spam, archive it, move it, send it, forward it, or even just navigate quickly around your mailboxes without leaving the keyboard.
Support is another strongpoint of the Gmail service - you can quickly search for an article that could answer almost anything you wanted to know.
Since the service IS in testing, things are improving all the time. Recently, for instance the service now works with the latest versions of Safari which is good for Mac users. Other features such as downloading your mail via Pop3 or IMAP are in development and will either be free, or be at a 'nominal charge'. That is a shame, but the online interface is good enough for it not to be a problem for now.
Using labels to mark mail for a particular purpose also increase general flexibility of finding important messages becuase in addition to the search you can have easy to find groupings of messages that are not static - i.e. you can have a message in more than one context.
Another nice feature is that mail takes on a more conversational aspect - it is not about formal letters and communication, it takes on a forum aspect with threaded messages, whilst collapsing previous replies/messages and showing the most recent. It is a different way of thinking of mail and is far more elegant. email is more discurrsive and flexible than a letter which is static. Hence gmail tries to give that impression, even going so far as to call them 'conversations'.
Plus, did I mention that the search function really does work really well? I can't stress that enough really. It just works. The mailtraq system I use at home is very harsh on resources when indexing, but all the work is done by dedicated google servers here. In effect, mail is organised and got at through meta-data and meta-organisation. It is in effect a replication of OS X's 'Piles' system, and the upcoming Longhorn WinFS. Muchos cool, and actually very efficient.
The adverts: people have made a big deal of this. Sadly, I don't really agree. I rely on adsense and adsearch to an extent for a small stream of income on my sites and it is always welcome. When seen from a webmaster's point of view, ad's become a necessary evil and adwords are nice becuase you can see them, but they are not obtrusive. They fit into the page very well and obstruct nothing. There are no pop-ups that obscure text - just considerate adverts that DO appear useful. So remember, some people depend on adwords and they made effort to stealth them rather than fill your screen with them.
**edit: I forgot to mention that when signing up, they do envisage many people signing up so there is a minimum username of 6 letters. no - or _ are allowed, only . . This suggests that they are positioning the service with a nomenclature of name.surname@gmail.com so the 1GB limit will be your whole life's mailing history possibly. It is intended to be a serious account, not for storing 1GB of spam. this is no hotmail. **
~~~~~~~~Interface~~~~~~~~ I love clean web designs that are easy to read, and scale well at all resolutions. The nice blue (green with search) and silver motif with the clear white means that your attention is always directed at your messages, and the contrast is perfectly legible. It is neither cluttered, nor is there anything vyying for your attention other than your messages.
The search options and filter options are also advanced enough for even the slightest detail of a message to make it traceable. It again shows the power of the indexing system behind it. This is no MSN search!
Contacts are also seamlessly added to your list as they mail you, or you mail them, and then autocomplete works as you would expect when sending messages.
The settings tab is also lacking very little. You can change how your name appears, even change the return-path address (rare for webmail). You can also enable the handy shortcuts as well as the labelling system for easy navigation and visual spooting of messages. The last thing of note beyond the obligatory signature box, is the ability to show a small bit of the message - just in case the subject is meaningless.
Other options allow you to create labels and filters easily, and finally you can even change all the security stuff - favourite question, personal details, and even permanently remove yourself from the service.
Other nice bits of the interface include amusing messages. When you open up the trash and there are no messages, you are greeted with: 'No conversations in the trash. Who needs to delete when you have 1000 MB of storage?!' Haha. lovely.
If you have no spam, you get the nice: 'Hooray, no spam here!'. Let's just say it's been a long time since I read hooray. It made it all seem that more of a conversationalist service. You can laugh, but this service intends to be personal, and it probably succeeds.
~~~~~~~~Performance~~~~~~~~ Out of all the tech things I review, Gmail is a very very hard thing to benchmark. Most of the time you will be limited directly by your own connection and the SMTP servers mail has travelled through before it arrives. Mailing performance is near impossible to judge.
However, on the whole most of my messages have been delivered instantaneously. Receipt of messages IS slower becuase it has to be indexed and scanned. For larger messages, the Gmail service could saturate my bandwidth so no problems. I was the limiting factor either in uploading a 9.9MB file via the web interface, or sending it from my home server. 5 stars for performance then.
Search performance through 1000 messages which I bulk sent myself was nice and snappy too. The spam filter is not perfect though and let in a few bits that I had mimmicked. Despite that, you can mark stuff as spam, send it to the spam bin, and alert the gmail team about it.
The service has also performed reliably enough for me to not have to mail the gmail team with anyproblems - so I don't know the performance of their support system.
Despite all this, forming conclusive judgements over performance is simply impossible. At this point in time gmail exceeds my expectations and is as fast as fastmail. However, that could all change once people are allowed to sign up. Hopefully Gmail will have implemented enough load balancing and network interconnects along with fast storage subsystems - only the fastest SCSI will do! This is expensive, and so it will be interesting to see if the performance levels can be sustained for all for free, or the 'nominal charge' will become more than nominal.
~~~~~~~~Conclusion~~~~~~~~ I have used a lot of webmail clients over the years, from the originaly yahoo mail, to its revamped 100MB version in use today. I have used hotmail, and I will be amused to see how quickly their future 250MB offerings will fill up with spam. I have used supanet webmail, fastmail, Mailtraq webmail, squirrel mail, IMHO webmail, Open Webmail, andMicrosoft Exchange webmail (2000 and 2003). However, Gmail appeals to me the most despite other firms playing catch-up. It might not be as feature rich as Exchange 2003 by a long shot, but who is going to setup exchange (and make it secure)?
Yes, admittedly I have my own mail server at home, and the mailtraq is a nice interface that comes with all the nifty features of spam blocking, advanced message filtering, no attachment limits, no mailbox limit etc. etc. However, such a system is not possible for everyone and is not worth the effort when there are good alternatives around that are available and can be used by anyone without any IT skills. So, in comes Gmail which promises everything.
At the moment, it delivers everything, and yet I could easily see it offering less as it fails due to its own success. Such a service works very fast now, but what happens when millions start to use it? Yahoo mail once they upped their limit to 100MB and 10MB per message saw massive performance and reliability problems. Will Gmail suffer the same fate of excessive bandwidth usage? I can't really say unfortunately. For now however, if you do get an invite, enjoy a top notch service with great performance, a great interface and an exclusive @gmail address. As it stands, how can you not love this service?
***************** AS of 2/12/04:
Well, Gmail is a living breathing beta project, so it is unsurprising that since I wrote this review, things have changed. Here are the most interesting new features: a) The contacts system has significantly improved over the old name and address system, and it is far more comprehensive in terms of what data it stores. It is far closer to what yahoo or hotmail provides. b) POP3 access is being planned and is being tested in a limited fashion. c) Plenty of tools exist, including Google's own which will check your mail box - this is an amazing tool which alerts you to new messages. IF you double click on it, it will lead your web browser to your mailbox login page - just as good as a mail client really. d) THIS IS NON GOOGLE: With the advent of gmailfs for Linux, a Windows version was born a short while ago. This makes your Gmail account appear as a computer drive - yes, a NORMAL COMPUTER DRIVE! WOW! so you can drag and drop files within explorer as if it were a backup internet site. Although the speed will be limited by your internet connection, it is still fast enough to backup key documents. They appear in your inbox as attached messages to yourself in the webmail application, but on your computer, just like a normal drive.
SO, How does all these extra goodies change my outlook? Not one iota. This is still an amazing service that is getting better every day. As a testament to its success and viability all other firms are following in Google's footsteps. As I said in my first conclusion, gmail is one thing you should certainly not be without.
********************
How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines
Advantages: 2086 MB storage space, searching for emails is based on the Google search engine, still fairly new so good email addresses are up for grabs, email grouping to form a conversation Disadvantages: Attachments are limited in size to 10 MB, Cannot import contacts from AOL at the present time.
Advantages: Easy to search and navigate around, some nice unique features, lots of storage, its free Disadvantages: Takes a while to get used to some of the more unique features
IzzyS 07.10.2007 (07.10.2007)
·
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful
Review of Google Mail (Gmail.com)
Advantages: 1000MB of storage space, easy to use, professional features allow users to tune the way it works Disadvantages: New kid on the block (still under testing), you may have a gmail account only by invite
wbafcben 24.03.2005 (24.03.2005)
·
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful
Review of Google Mail (Gmail.com)
exceptional by (27%):
very helpful by (73%):
