Author's product rating:
| Advantages: |
I've failed to think of any |
| Disadvantages: |
It's pathetic, it's killing real music and it can even be dangerous |
| Recommend to potential buyers: |
no |
Ooh, I could rant my head off over this, I really could! But you probably don’t want to see, or even listen, to me when I’m in one of my stressy fits, so I’ll try and make this op as coherent and balanced as possible. I just wish that the ‘musicians’ of today would do the same with their ‘songs’.
Before I wrote this op, for the purpose of research I went and checked out this week’s Top 40 chart. As this represents the most popular music which is most widely listened to, I feel this represents the core of modern music most accurately. As I expected, I was not impressed by what I found.
First, I crossed out all the songs which are cover versions. Next, I scribbled through the tracks which display all the lyrical ingenuity of an inebriated monkey, repeating the same phrases over and over until they bore into your mind. Subsequently, I took great pleasure in striking through the artists who I feel are successful based on their looks and their image as opposed to their actual music. Now, I was satisfied that I was left with all the real artists, the genuine musicians who are actually trying to make an honest buck by producing decent music. These are the artists whom I respect.
All seven of them.
You don’t need to be a genius to work out that this represents a pretty poor turnout. This means that for every proper musician, there are four or five more talentless wastrels just out to make a fast buck. This, to me, epitomises what is wrong with the modern music scene.
Some of the artists popular today make me cringe. Take the example of the Cheeky Girls. Look at them, they can barely even speak English! But clearly that doesn’t matter any more, since as long as they cavort around in their size six skirts, touching each other’s derriere with now-monotonous regularity, whether they actually have any musical talent is irrelevant.
Let’s take another example. How many of you have heard the Fast Food Song? For those of you lucky enough still to be blissfully unfamiliar with it, its lyrics are as follows:
“McDonalds, McDonalds, Kentucky Fried Chicken and a Pizza Hut.’
Yep, that’s it. All accompanied by lots of ridiculous dancing around in PVC dresses. Pathetic.
To me, all this reeks of exploitation. This bubblegum pop is the brainchild of greedy music bosses, who take acts with no demonstrable talent and whip their target audience (pre-pubescent teenagers, no doubt!) into a frenzy with their clever marketing ploys. They’re taking advantage of both the performers and their impressionable audience, purely to line their own pockets.
This has very serious consequences for what I like to call real music. Real music to me is music which the recording artist has had input in; that is, they have been involved with the production of the track, and they actually sing it, rather than all this ridiculous miming. How would you feel if you were a genuine artist, you were truly passionate about your music, you saw it as the perfect expression of your feelings as it’s meant to be, yet no-one ever got to hear it due to the music scene being dominated by these bland, carbon-copied excuses for musicians? Musicians are very much an endangered species.
It doesn’t stop here. The effects of the commercialisation of music stretch far beyond threatening original music. I worry about the effect it has on its audience, particularly the audience which most of it is aimed at, the early teenage years. I think the image which is being presented to these people by the pop stars they love to idolise is potentially very dangerous.
This is particularly relevant to young girls. Holly Valance, Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera et al are saying to their listeners: ‘Look, you don’t need to put any effort into that school lark, you don’t need to be good at anything! Just take your clothes off and you’ll be raking it in like me.’
At an age where it is traditional for one to be very conscious of their appearance and image, these scantily-clad pop stars have the potential to do some serious damage. What kind of message are these singers with their gym-toned figures giving to their audience? Their environment at this age has a huge influence on the way they develop into an adult. We risk a generation of teenage girls starving themselves to death in order to obtain a figure like Holly’s. It’s when this commercialisation reaches this level that something has to be done; it’s far beyond irritating now.
Recently there have been signs of a downturn in fortunes for fat-cat music bosses. Viewing figures for Top of the Pops are at an all-time low. ‘But that’s no problem, we just need to update the format a bit.’ Meanwhile, single sales are also dropping quickly. ‘Aah, this is because of music piracy. We need to stamp it out!’ Hiding behind these excuses, record company bosses consistently fail to see the truth. Modern music sucks, and there is a growing backlash against an industry predominantly driven by image rather than talent. This is why fans are becoming disillusioned. It needs to be rectified, before the music industry implodes catastrophically upon itself.
Now I know that manufactured music isn’t something which has come about in the last few years; there were always acts like The Monkees who were formed on this principle. But it’s when it reaches the level it’s at today that we need to be concerned. Acts never top the charts for more than one week; instead, they just disappear into obscurity, ready for the next bland act to take their place. Acts are treated as an expendable resource with a ridiculously short lifetime, because when they flounder another is just churned out to take their place. It’s the Great Musical Production Line.
I resent this, because I feel that it goes against everything that music is supposed to be. My idea of music is of something which expresses your innermost feelings in a way which other media just can’t; a good song combines vocals and instrumentation to a stirring and beautiful effect which has a lasting effect on the memory. How many of you will remember Gareth Gates in twenty years’ time?
The music industry is as fickle as it is insecure. It has sold its originality and its roots in British culture, in favour of ever increasing profits. Now, it just seems to lurch from one embarrassingly shameful act to another. And it’s telling; one day, it may just come back to haunt it.
One day, record companies will get their comeuppance. I, for one, can’t wait.
Thanks for the read, which turned into a rant despite my best efforts,
Matt
PS. I’m currently constructing a web site to fight for the survival of real music. I’ll put the details up when I’ve got some content sorted.
| More Reviews |
Tes co-operated and took the Safeway home
Review of Has modern music become too commercialised? by
Dardalius
Advantages: None
Disadvantages: None
...years of chart music there has been a huge amount of chart acts ranging from ‘talented and innovative’ to ‘unoriginal and talentless’, there have always been the manipulated bands (Baycity Rollers, the Monkeys, Spice girls), the formulae driven music (Dave Clark 5, Kajagoogoo, Millie Vanille) and the novelty acts (Wurzels, Mike Flowers Pops) which have popped (sorry) in and out of the charts. Add to this the one hit wonders, some which fully deserved ... ...it very nature is and has always been commercialised, or at least controlled by commercial means (take the Beatles as an example, turned down by Decca because ‘guitar music was on the way out’, oops). What I think we are seeing, and makes it seem worse, is a feeding frenzy at a waterhole which is running dry. At one time it was singles and record sales from which most of the income was derived, which meant you had to maintain talented artists and ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average very helpful |
|
very helpful

25.02.2003
|
Will B.S. Music and Moronic TV Ever Go Away?
Review of Has modern music become too commercialised? by
eve6kicksass
Advantages: Music is essential to many people's lives
Disadvantages: Has it gone too far in on many levels???
...here as to where music has gone as far as the 21st century is concerned. So, sit back, read and have an open mind....to me it makes sense, and I hope it does to some extent to all of you too. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<GROWING UP WITH MUSIC>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Exactly....who has not grown up with music? Even if you were raised by wolves in the Rockies or the Alps, or if you have been kept in isolation, I'm sure that every single person has listened to some form ... ...keep in mind that everyone has grown up listening to different forms of music, and usually you must contend and listen to what your parents did, hoping that you like the same thing. My parents were married in the mid 1960s. That's right....no B.S., no Christine Assguileira, no J. Ho, what they had was real REAL Rock Music, the pioneers of a thier time....it started with Bill Haley and His Comets, and went on through the Band, Rolling Stones, and ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average very helpful |
|
very helpful

10.12.2003
(14.12.2003)
|
sex sells
Review of Has modern music become too commercialised? by
angels21
Advantages: it keeps the public interested
Disadvantages: is talent being overlooked for scandal
...In recent months there has been the scandal over the way the likes of eminem and Ozzy Osbourne are corrupting childrens mind. With their songs full of swearing, violence and promotion of drugs.One cant go into a record shop now without seeing parental guidance stickers on the cds. When questioned about this the artist replies that they are trying to make them see the wrong in doing what they did. If that is so, then why is there so much bad language ... ...Another area of music that has caused controversy is gangster music like garage and hip hop. This has been linked to the shootings of which music with lyrics about guns and shooting has been named as a cause for the increase in gun crimes in the uk. This type of music derived from the USA where their gun crime rate is incredibly high.
The main seller of music is sex. the major artists all know this and use it do get as much publicity as they can. ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average very helpful |
|
very helpful

14.02.2003
|
Give us musiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiic!
Review of Has modern music become too commercialised? by
monsieur.Joda
Advantages: boarf`
Disadvantages: Grompf
...I would say that music has always been a business. Since the beatles. Yes, that far.
Money in music probably happened a long time ago. I mean artists have always been paid to perform.. Until one day somebody put his money on a band, allowing them to release an album, and share the love for music with others. Money obviously got involved.
Nowadays, money in music hasn't the same purpose. Money in music today is meant to create even more money.
... ...nice lad... Ok, the guitarist has an afro and looks like a dog, but hey, he kicks arses... And the basssist as well... Actually all of them... But you go to their gig and all what you see is a bunch of teenager screaming and passing out because the singer looked at them...
Jesus Christ...
I personally made my choice. I chose quality over look attitude and publicity.
Look at bands like Opeth, Bumblefoot, Freak Kitchen. Of course you never heard ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average very helpful |
|
very helpful

14.06.2004
|
IT'S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY
Review of Has modern music become too commercialised? by
LostWitness
Advantages: Cash up for grabs...
Disadvantages: ...but don't expect any credibility
...view, and consider whether music has become overly commercialised.
Music is a deeply personal thing to most people – indeed, if you took a poll of a thousand people and asked them one thing that they could not live without, I’m quite sure that music would be quite high up on the list. Due to its personal nature, music is not just about providing entertainment – it is about fashion, image and personality and more and more people ... ...is that over time, this has developed into something of a musical snobbery within society, where bands and singers are thrust into the limelight on a wave of fame and popularity, only to disappear again overnight, simply because the masses have been told that they are no longer trendy to listen to. This kind of attitude comes as no surprise, when you consider the pandering towards fashion in other markets – as a society, we are incredibly fickle ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average very helpful |
|
very helpful

30.07.2002
|