Intel Celeron D 335 / 2.8 GHz processor

Author's product rating:   

Speed	Average
Ease of Installation	Good - quick to install
Manufacturer Support	Good
Instruction manual	Good
Value For Money	Satisfactory

Advantages:	it has dual channel and it is pretty fast
Disadvantages:	the sempron 2800 +  it's better for gaming

Recommend to potential buyers:

yes

Full review

Ok! so we are going to do a little comparison betwen sempron 2800+ and celron D335. They bouth have difrent dets of instruction for example celeron D has MMX ,SSE ,SSE2 ,SSE 3 and Sempron has MMX and 3D now. OK so let's see the difrences : Amd Sempron has 3DNow! technology wich will allow for a faster frame rate, smoother graphics and higher detail in our animation,so it is batter for games; The SSE instructions In Celeron D allows for complex arithmetics and some graphics capabilities but wich aren't as efective as the 3DNow!'s technology capabilities.So in the end Celeron is better for raw computing power , and Sempron for gammers.But let's analyse it some more.Celeron D has a 533 Bus wich allows dual channel memory and sempron has 333 bus with single channel memory.otherwise they have the same L2 cache of 256Kb ,Celeron has L1 of 28kb sempron has 128 kb L1.Celeron D is build on 90nm technology ,Sempron on 130 nm.But sempron has the old cooling problem i had one on a gigabyte board and it was allways staying at 56 degrees celsius.Celeron D335 stays at 45degrees.In the end the bouth have their pluses and minuses but they are bouth the same.Like i said i think sempron is better for gaming ,and celeron has batter memory spids and processing power wich will be seen when arhiveing with winrar.