Home > Computers > CPUs > Intel CPUs
A Return to the Intel Fold 18 of 18 Ciao Users found the following review helpful
Rating from sexyjw 5 Stars ()

Advantages Blistering performance. Good overclocker. 64-bit processing.

Disadvantages Pricey. Heat sink and fan is a little strange.

Since building my first PC in 1999, I had used AMD processors. Initially, it was just an enthusiast, cost-based decision. But as the Athlons improved, and then gave way to the Athlon 64s, I truly believed that AMD were making the best processors.

It was with a feeling of unfaithfulness, then, that I began to research the Core 2 Duo processors, having heard some incredible things about them. It seemed that these processors were better overclockers, but at the same time, less power-hungry.

For the non-technical readers here, overclocking is a method used by us 'geeks' to run the CPU at a higher speed than it is rated for. By and large, it is a safe procedure, as long as you know what you are doing. If you compare the costs of processors, it becomes apparent that overclocking a slower rated processor, to run at the speed of a faster rated processor, can effectively be a money saver.

Having read many articles concerning the Core 2 Duos, I decided that I did, indeed, wish to move across to this architecture. One small problem though, was that my old system had effectively reached the end of the upgrade line. This meant that I would need to buy new:

- processor
- motherboard
- DDR2 memory
- PCI Expressgraphics card
- SATA hard drive (not essential, but advisable)

I weighed up the pros and cons between the different Core 2 Duos, and decided that the E6600 was the way to go. I wanted the slowest rated version of the 4MB cache CPU. This doubled (from the 2MB of the E6300 and E6400) cache is another factor of the CPU that can speed up number crunching processes.

I won't go into details of the rest of the hardware that I bought - it's largely irrelevant here. It will suffice to say that I bought an Intel 975X chipset motherboard, 2GB of RAM, and a middle-of-the-road graphics card.

When the system arrived, I built everything else, and arrived at the installation of the CPU. The processor has no pins on it's underside - that was the first thing that I found strange. Instead, it has a matrix of copper pads, which touch the pins sticking up from the 'socket' on the motherboard. It was easy to determine which way the processor went in, and it was also extremely easy to close the processor retainer.

Once the processor was in though, I attempted to fit the heat sink and fan. It was a strange process. It all fitted together OK...it's just the 'feel' of it that I didn't like. Basically, the heat sink fits onto the socket using four corner pins.Once these are in place, it's a case of pressing each one until it clicks. The pressure required is worryingly hard...but despite my worst fears, everything engaged correctly, and nothing was broken.

After getting everything installed onto the hard drive, I fired up SiSoft Sandra (a benchmarking tool), and checked that the processor was running at a speed commensurate with it's rated clock frequency. No problems.

Without going into major details, using the supplied heat sink and fan, and without increasing any voltages to the processor, I managed to overclock this CPU from it's rated 2.

Detailed Rating

Speed
Ease of Installation
Stability
Manufacturer Support
Instruction manual
Value For Money

The Author

sexyjw since 23 Nov 2003

Hello. I'm John, 34 years old. I'm an IT Consultant, for a credit card processor. I live with my... more

Be the first to trust me

Rate this User Review

How helpful was this review to you? Rating guidelines

Attention, this is the first review from this author

Instead of giving a negative rating, consider:

  • Help this member by giving your advice

  • Report fraud (for example plagiarism) or other issue with the review to the Ciao support team

Activate low rating buttons

Add your comment

 Post comment  Post comment

JavaScript should be enabled to rate or post a comment.

Comments

Maybe you have a question about Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 / 2.4 GHz processor? Ask here
Previous page Next page Page 1 of 4 | 1 - 5 out of 19 comments
  • Morning_Becomes_Electra 27/08/2007 21:51
    Rated this review as
    Very Helpful
  • Bossman1959 21/07/2007 18:31
    Rated this review as
    Exceptional
  • suar 08/06/2007 20:12

    a helpful review, but would have been great if you would have said more about its performance in general than overclocking... and true, the processor is mind blowing..

  • lucuzade 24/05/2007 17:34
    Rated this review as
    Very Helpful

    great review, do you think it's worth me upgrading from a pentium 4 3ghz to this processor for 130 quid, bearing in mind i am a student so don't really have much money to spare!

  • torr 17/03/2007 10:32
    Rated this review as
    Very Helpful
Previous page Next page Page 1 of 4 | 1 - 5 out of 19 comments

More reviews

for Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 / 2.4 GHz processor

Compare prices

for Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 / 2.4 GHz processor