Home > Ciao Café > Current Debate > Is global warming an urgent danger? > Reviews

critical_... 4

critical_writer

Add to my Circle of Trust

Subscribe to reviews

About me:

Member since:01.01.1970

Reviews:15

Quote-start

Why It's Important

Quote-end
24.07.2002 (05.10.2006)

Advantages:
not applicable

Disadvantages:
not applicable

Recommendable No:

20 Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful See ratings
exceptional by (3%):
  1. muttleythefrog
very helpful by (97%):
  1. Claiiiree
  2. Coloneljohn
  3. Paiceyjohn
and 35 other members

View all ratings

The overall rating of a review is different from a simple average of all individual ratings.

Share this review on Google+

Article 41 authorizes the Security Council to impose nonmilitary sanctions such as completely or partially severing diplomatic and economic relations, transportation and communications links.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad warned Wednesday that sanctions will not stop Iran from enriching uranium after European foreign policy chief Javier Solana conceded that "endless hours" of talks with top Iranian negotiator Ali Larijani had made little progress and suggested the dispute could wind up at the U.N. soon.

The talks had been seen as a last-ditch attempt to avoid a full-blown confrontation between Iran and the Security Council after Tehran ignored an Aug. 31 deadline to suspend enrichment - a key step toward making nuclear weapons - or face punishment.

"The time of negotiations of course is not infinite, but we'll try to do the utmost," Solana said Thursday after talks in Rome with Italian Foreign Minister Massimo D'Alema. "I think that even if we fail now we should keep the doors open for dialogue with Iran."

Senior U.N. diplomats told The Associated Press on Tuesday that Iran's refusal to freeze uranium enrichment had sabotaged the talks, opening the way for the Security Council to start considering sanctions next week. The diplomats spoke on condition of anonymity because Solana has not formally declared the talks dead.


  Write your own review

Share this review on Google+

« Previous review   Next review »

Rate this review »

How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines

Rate as exceptional

Rate as somewhat helpful

Rate as very helpful

Rate as not helpful

Rate as helpful

Rate as off topic

Write your own review Report a problem with this review’s content

Comments about this review »

muttleythefrog 02.08.2005 00:55

Exceptionally well constructed... realistic and in keeping with general scientific understanding. There is little I can really add to this, except to say there are other greenhouses gases such as Methane which are emitted in vast quantities from our mass farming of animals globally. I felt that this review would and should reach a wide audience because it was easy on the eye yet blinding in prediction. There really is no other rating than E for this clever and honest piece of work.

Coloneljohn 11.01.2005 15:35

Good informative review. John

inycon2 01.09.2004 23:36

Interesting read, unfortunately governments seem more concerned about power, war and telling everybody how to live their lives rather than global warming.

Add your comment

max. 2000 characters

  Post comment

More reviews »

Review Ratings »

This review of Is global warming an urgent danger? has been rated:

"exceptional" by (3%):

  1. muttleythefrog

"very helpful" by (97%):

  1. Claiiiree
  2. Coloneljohn
  3. Paiceyjohn

and 35 other members

The overall rating of a review is different from a simple average of all individual ratings.