Home > Cameras > APS Cameras > Kodak APS Cameras
Short ones and tall ones. 27 of 27 Ciao Users found the following review helpful
Rating from romybuzzer 2 Stars ()

Advantages Options for taking wide pictures

Disadvantages Film price picture quality.

I bought myself an APS camera about a year ago and opted for a Kodak one.
I did this because Kodak are well known for film so I presumed they make good cameras too.
It is a nice looking camera. Finished in Silver with a retractable zoom lense, it looks a lot more expensive than the £100 I spent on it.
The corners are very smooth so it sits nicely in your hand and is about the size of your average compact 35 mm camera.
It is also a very lightweight camera for its size.
Film auto winds as with most modern cameras so there is no chance of forgetting to do this.
It has a built in flash for when you are snapping in low level light and a point and shoot action. Basically it automatically focuses on whatever you point it at. There is a little box on the viewfinder that you aim with. Press the button to take the picture half way and it whirs and flicks in and out to get a crisp shot from any distance.
With APS you have the choice of 2 zoom setting for either normal pictures (30mm) or wider, group pictures (60mm) remember, it will use up more of the film in the camera if you continuously take the wider shots.
However, I have found that the picture quality is often poor and this is not down to the user.
Point and shoot is very good on some cameras. My Olympus IS3000 will snap as soon as you focus on an image. This APS camera does not. It spends forever zooming and focusing and can never make its mind up as to when it is focused. Forget action shots, it just wont focus in time.
A big drawback in the APS world is the price of films. They are nearly twice the price of normal 35 mm film and can prove expensive. You may also find yourself limited as to where you can take your film for processing. I dont find that the benefits of choosing my style of picture are as great as first thought. How often do you need to take panoramic shots?
I dont reccommend this camera at all. In fact, you are much better off with an automatic 35 mm standard camera for this money. It will be highly superior.


Detailed Rating

Picture Quality
Range & Quality of Features
Ease of Use
Durability
Reliability
Size
Weight
more

The Author

romybuzzer

Author's newest reviews

Rate this User Review

How helpful was this review to you? Rating guidelines

Attention, this is the first review from this author

Instead of giving a negative rating, consider:

  • Help this member by giving your advice

  • Report fraud (for example plagiarism) or other issue with the review to the Ciao support team

Activate low rating buttons

Add your comment

 Post comment  Post comment

JavaScript should be enabled to rate or post a comment.

Comments

Maybe you have a question about Kodak Advantix F600 Zoom Compact Camera? Ask here
Previous page Next page Page 1 of 6 | 1 - 5 out of 28 comments
  • bmthkatie 20/02/2008 15:59
    Rated this review as
    Very Helpful
  • lyndaburnsuk 18/03/2005 11:54
    Rated this review as
    Very Helpful

    Good review, very informative. Thanks

  • jonathan_berry 14/07/2002 14:04
    Rated this review as
    Very Helpful
  • MRSCANADA 28/03/2002 17:47
    Rated this review as
    Very Helpful
  • Honey_Bee 25/03/2002 18:31
    Rated this review as
    Very Helpful
Previous page Next page Page 1 of 6 | 1 - 5 out of 28 comments

More reviews

for Kodak Advantix F600 Zoom Compact Camera

Similar Offers

for Kodak Advantix F600 Zoom Compact Camera