Dudler 5

Dudler

Add to my Circle of Trust

Subscribe to reviews

About me:

Member since:25.11.2000

Reviews:12

Members who trust:2

Quote-start

Kodak Tri-X

Quote-end
18.01.2001

Advantages:
Reliable, tolerant, a piece of living history !

Disadvantages:
Newer films are sharper and less grainy

Recommendable Yes:

2 Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful See ratings
very helpful by (100%):
  1. positronic
  2. gideon

View all ratings

The overall rating of a review is different from a simple average of all individual ratings.

Share this review on Google+

Kodak Tri-X is, I think, the oldest stager on the market: it was around years before I started taking pictures in the late Sixties. Of course, like all the other standard films, it has been modified and improved over the years, but the essential character is unchanged.

Resilience is the watchword here. There are sharper films. There are less grainy films. None of them will produce good results in any developer, and none are so tolerant of ill-treatment. There are rumours that you can develop good Tri-X negatives in Brown Windsor soup – and they might well be true!

Tri-X was the standard film from the Sixties onwards for press photography because of this tolerance of extreme abuse. The fact that it gave reasonable grain and very good sharpness for a fast film certainly helped: but the ability to survive in the Vietnam jungle and the Gobi desert made it a winner.

The current version is still as good, even though it’s overshadowed by Kodak’s T-Max emulsions. T-Max 400 has less grain, and is sharper, as well as being inherently slightly faster (Tri-X is happiest around half the rated speed). However, T-Max films are rather high-strung, and only work at their best in Kodak’s own (very expensive) T-Max developer. Ultimately, extending development to increase film speed is easier with Tri-X (another reason why photojournalists favour it).

So if you fancy using a tried and trusted professional film, you could do a lot worse than buying a few rolls of TX. I suspect that you’ll come back for more of this ultimate survivor.


  Write your own review

Share this review on Google+

 

Rate this review »

How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines

Rate as exceptional

Rate as somewhat helpful

Rate as very helpful

Rate as not helpful

Rate as helpful

Rate as off topic

Write your own review Write a review and you will earn 0.5p per rating if other members rate your review at least helpful. Write a review and you will earn 0.5p per rating if other members rate your review at least helpful.   Report a problem with this review’s content

Comments about this review »

Add the first comment!

max. 2000 characters

Post comment

Review Ratings »

This review of Kodak Tri-X Camera Film has been rated:

"very helpful" by (100%):

  1. positronic
  2. gideon

The overall rating of a review is different from a simple average of all individual ratings.

Products you might be interested in »

Canon Camera battery (5108B002)

Canon Camera battery (5108B002)

(+) excellent battery life, reliable, lightweight
(-) priced 2.5 times more than competitors for the same if not better quality

User reviews (1)

Buy now for only £ 22.47

Canon 100-400mm f4.5-5.6 AF

Canon 100-400mm f4.5-5.6 AF

(+) Solid build quality, excellent results, quick focussing, quiet motor
(-) Rather expensive, could be heavy if carrying around all day

User reviews (3)

Buy now for only £ 1,049.95



Are you the manufacturer / provider of Kodak Tri-X Camera Film? Click here