Diamond review

BUILD YOUR OWN WORLD

5 Mar 5th, 2005 (Apr 12th, 2005)

Advantages:
almost infinite variety, excellent quality, very durable, years of play and then can be passed on, teach design, sense of space and shape, dexterity

Disadvantages:
none, unelss your child is not into LEGO

Recommendable: Yes 

magdadh

About me: I am back for a purely mercantile purpose. I will not automatically return reads or ratings, but wil...

Member since:22.04.2004

Reviews:174

Members who trust:65

Review rated by 96 Ciao members on average: very helpful

**** So how come I am writing about LEGOŽ? After all there is already plenty enough reviews about it? ****

I remember my first box of LEGO. I was 6 or 7 and seeing it emerge from my parents' bag after their shopping trip to Czechoslovakia was a dream come true. It was one of the BASIC sets and had a good selection of straight and roof bricks, windows, doors, people, wheels and a couple of odd gadgets like a rotary base for windmill for example.

This first box was a start of a life-time love affair. After the first set came others, purchased abroad or in special shops where you could buy Western goods for hard currency. I never got a Technic set (which were at the pinnacle of LEGO in my time), as they were much too expensive, so I was left to look longingly at the folders displaying Meccano-like bars, pistons and gears. Apart from that, I had most of other types and I played with my LEGO pretty much until puberty, probably at least until the age of 11 or 12. At some point I developed a pattern or a game whose objective was to utilise ALL blocks I had in meaningful way.

I donated all my LEGO to a friend's child in my early twenties, when even the idea of producing a progeny of my own was totally unimaginable. Now my daughter is approaching 4 years of age I can revisit my LEGO-love without embarrassment. Two small tubs of normal-sized blocks that we started with have already mushroomed to two bucketfuls (LEGO buckets so far, I hasten to add, but I can well imagine being able to fill a garden sized one few years down the line). She's building away, I don't know if because she actually likes doing it herself, or because she sees my interest - and to be honest I don't care.

This review's intention is to present a factual summary of LEGO as construction toy, biased and hopefully enriched by my personal experience as a user in my own time as well as a parent of a budding new user.

**** Introduction for the uninitiated****

LEGO is probably the best 'concept' or 'high tech' toy ever produced (apart perhaps from a PC but these were not designed explicitly for children to play with...).

For those who managed to get to review-reading age without encountering it, LEGO is a system of toys, based on building bricks which connect to each other securely using little knobbly extensions/pimples/plugs (????) which fit into hollow socekts on other blocks. I will refer to these 'things' as dots from now on. Apart from square/rectangular bricks the good people at LEGO have developed a mind-boggling variety of basic and less basic blocks and an even bigger range of additional widgets. These have been more recently supplemented with an array of non-construction toys, computer software, amusement parks and even a clothing range. This review will concern itself with the construction-toy aspect of the LEGO enterprise. There are separate categories for many LEGO sub-branches, including the LEGOLAND. I have only experience two items of LEGO clothing, both second-hand sweatshirts, and was very happy with them: quality and design similar to what you would expect from H&M products.

****Company and History****

The name LEGO comes from the Danish words 'Leg Godt', which means 'Play well'. In Latin it means 'I put together'.

LEGO company values include creativity, imagination, fun, quality and learning and for once I can say that the product seem to match the blurb pretty much to the word.

It all started about half a century ago, in Denmark. LEGO socketing bricks were launched in 1958. Today LEGO is the fourth largest toy manufacturer (after Mattel, Hasbro and Bandai). According to the company literature, LEGO history can be seen as comprison of four eras or phases: at first play centred on construction, then movement came in the form of wheels, small motors and gears, third era comprised role play and themes and the fourth era is apparently currently under way, 'with intelligence and behaviour an integral part of the LEGO product'.


****Variety****

LEGO blocks come in several types, and the main types or classes differ in size from each other. There is some basic compatibility between neighbouring LEGO classes (you can connect some of the standard LEGO bricks to DUPLO ones for example) but they are probably best viewed as separate classes of toys.

BABY (which, confusingly, used to be know as DUPLO)
...are, as the name suggests, designed for the smallest children (up to 18 months old). This range comprises many toys and only some very simple blocks with rather giant sized 'dots' which are rounded, presumably for safety. These are perfect for the little clumsy hands of toddlers and they fit together loosely, so they are easy to both put together and dismantle - this means of course that the constructions are not very secure, but a delight in demolishing a tower is often bigger than the pleasure of building one! There are also more 'normal' toys in the BABY range, but I would honestly say that unless you have *a lot* of money or are planning on many babies in quick succession, the expense isn't very justified, despite excellent quality.

QUATRO
...have been introduced only recently and seem to be designed to be a mid-range blocks between BABY and DUPLO, with one QUATRO dot equivalent in size to eight DUPLO dots. Undoubtedly a lot of clever market research have been done prior to introducing these, but to me they seem pretty pointless for most children. QUATRO are recommended for 1 to 3 year olds but in my opinion a normally-dexterous toddler growing out of BABY should be pretty much ready to engage with the DUPLO. However, I have no personal experience of this range and thus cannot comment in detail. Overall they seem all right if a bit spurious. If your child is 12-18 months old and has no LEGO BABY , I would probably recommend buying a set of QUATRO as a first try.

DUPLO
...are pretty much like oversized versions of 'normal' LEGO and are recommended for 2 to 5 year olds. I would roughly agree with the starting age, but 5 seems much too old for me: a 3.5 - 4 year old should be getting used to normal-sized LEGO with no problems. I would buy DUPLO for children aged 18-30 months, or perhaps up to 36 months if they had no experience of LEGO type bricks before.

The variety of blocks is pretty good, with mostly rectangles and few sloping ones. Blocks with eyes and other animal parts (lion's head, tail etc) are included in some sets while models suggested on boxes and buckets are more or less two-dimensional, which is very suitable to perceptual and design faculties of children of DUPLO-appropriate age. These blocks are compatible with normal LEGO, provided the bricks you are connecting to DUPLO are at least 2 dots wide. I wouldn't get rid of your old DUPLO for a while after the collection of normal LEGO is started, as they provide very useful material for large-scale buildings - walls, ramparts etc.

NORMAL-SIZED LEGO is divided into:

- MAKE AND CREATE including Technic: these are the most traditional, and in my opinion the best LEGO sets. Sizes of sets vary from few blocks to many hundred and there are sub-ranges within this category, each with a slightly different theme. Some sets are more general (Creator buckets and boxes), some are devoted to specific models of monsters, animal and houses (Designer, Technic).

- STORIES AND ACTION including Belville, Bionicle, Pirates, Harry Potter and many others. These are somewhere between LEGO construction toys and story-play toys of the Palymobil type. The construction element is reduced, albeit still present. I am not terribly fond of these sets, not that there is something wrong with them, more because I think their purpose can be accomplished more easily with other brands of toys (from Playmobil to Little People to McDonald's figurines). However, I would say that especially 'girly girls' might be more interested in sets from this range which still include some construction elements than in traditional LEGO building blocks.

- NEXT programmable robots. These look absolutely fantastic. However, I am 34 and thus bit too old and certainly too busy to justify involvement, while my daughter at 3.5 is still outside target group for those kinds of toys.

Plus abominable, Barbie-like thing called is CLICKITS which seems to me a prostitution of the LEGO idea and thus I will just leave it with a mention.

I would say that you can start buying normal-sized LEGO from about 3 years of age. My daughter started to use it around 3.5, but the more complicated stuff will need brain and hand capacities rarely avialble before the age of 6 or even 9.


****So what is so special about LEGO?****

In many cases I am very critical about brand-hype and refuse to pay a premium for a label. LEGO is, however, one of the cases which defies my suspicion of brands. Cheaper alternatives exists, of course (MegaBlocks come to mind) but in my opinion they simply don't even start to compare. The main reason for that is quality.

Quality of design which means that LEGO bricks do what they are supposed to do and that the level of frustration is minimal.

Quality of concept which means that all LEGO sets are fundamentally compatible (and that includes partial compatibility with larger-sized ranges like DUPLO). And the same quality offers a simply unique versatility and play potential.

But first and foremost, the quality of production which means that the blocks lasts for what is a very, very long time indeed. I have no idea what plastic is used to make LEGO, but it seems to be better than anything used to make other toys. It's neither brittle nor squashy, it seems to never break or split at the edges (so safety-conscious can be happy as well). The colour stays vibrant. Most of the bricks are virtually unbreakable: you would have trouble with a hammer. I don't know what the life-span of LEGO brick is, but you can comfortably play with ones made in the late 70's and notice *no* loss of quality. Using teeth to prise the blocks apart (particularly common with flats, and smooth flats) is something that is going to result in small marks, but that's about it, and even these marks will not be very noticeable. You can happily count on passing your own LEGO to your children (and factor in at least one or two other kids in between).

****How much LEGO do you need?****

To be honest, you probably need quite a lot to have a real go. Nowadays LEGO markets 'pocket pods' and 'travel tubs' which are all fair enough, but I would say that a bucketful (6x6x9 inches) or about 1kg of bricks and simpler widgets (windows, wheels etc.) is when a serious play can start. Adding 'fancy' bits which are, of course, less versatile, means generally you will need more LEGO. Overall the more the merrier though once you get to certain amount the compulsion to buy more lessens.: it's nice to get new sets, but it's possible to just stick to what you have.


****Any disadvantages?****

None as such, in my opinion. The most common criticism of LEGO is that it is expensive. Yes, if you consider the unit price it *is* expensive. However, considering the longevity of the blocks and the amount of time that they can be played with, the price fades almost into insignificance. The initial outlay doesn't have to be large. Buy a simple bucket for a tenner or less, or a good vintage set on e-bay for 6-8 pounds, or scrounge of friends and relatives. Then just slowly build up and don't go mad on fancy bits.

Amongst minor disadvantages of LEGO (and any other block sets) is that they can create an impression of extreme untidiness when poured out onto a reasonable play area (floor or a large table) and then left there for the rest of the week. And very few things in a child's room can compare to the pain of stepping on a LEGO block with a foot of an adult of a considerable weight....

But of course not all children like LEGO. Some do and some don't and the ones that don't will probably not make it worthwhile amassing a large or even a medium sized collection. LEGO BABY are simply good toys, and while a bucket of QUATRO or DUPLO will not go amiss in a toy-box of most children, I would recommend waiting until the child acquires reasonable dexterity and ability to work in three dimensions (though a lot of current LEGO models proposed in their idea-booklets seem to be two-dimensional, actually) before deciding if LEGO is The Thing or not. A variety of LEGO existing today makes it more likely that some part of the range will attract a child, though in my personal opinion, LEGO is worth the money for building, the story-playing toys can be obtained from other makers at a lower price and with more realistic designs and bigger variety.

LEGO is essentially a unisex toy, though I would hazard a guess that more boys will become life-long addicts than girls, and that more girls will show no interest at all. Most of LEGO is, however, not mechanical/technical (like Meccano for example) and a lot of more 'girly' themes and constructions are possible now, from houses to animals, people to interior decorations; there are even whole types targeted at girls including fairy-princesses of Belville and possibly even the Harry Potter world.


**** Why bother?****

LEGO is invariably listed amongst educational toys. This label has always been vaguely suspicious to me, as well as artificial, as all toys, especially for smaller children are more or less educational (though I would hesitate a bit near Pokemon and related...).

Building with LEGO is in a league with other 'creative' activities, like painting, drawing, modelling with clay and sandcastle building. It develops three-dimensional thinking and , eventually, design skills. I think these are particularly useful now as so much stuff is two-dimensional on the computer or television screen. Playing out stories with built scenes/backdrops develops imagination and ability to construct plots. In the early years it also contributes to manual dexterity, while later on if and when the more sophisticated features are used it teaches about IT.

Overall though and regardless of educational values LEGO is great fun and for children who are into it is guaranteed to provide hours and hours of fun that might even, who knows, be educational.


****Availability****

LEGO is available from pretty much every shop selling toys. The selection isn't often that great, though. Even in Toys'R'Us the number of sets and their selection didn't seem that impressive. I bought a decent bucket of normal-sized LEGO from Aldi for 7.99 GBP just before Christmas. I also bought a very good sized box of DUPLO blocks from Woolworths for 9.99 GBP (but that was reduced form 19.99). In other words, look out for bargains.

However, for all you Internet-enabled shoppers out there, there is a definite solution, or even two.

For all your new LEGO blocks that are not available in your local toyshop, including very specialist selections like for example 250 red roof bricks for 24.99 GBP (I WILL buy them one day!!!!!) use www.lego.com (delivery charges vary from 3.25 to 5.25 GBP).

For vintage LEGO (often the best!) go straight to e-bay where a lot (and I mean, a LOT) of LEGO is sold and bought. There is usually a lot of interest so real bargains are not very likely, but some sellers have very reasonable Buy-Now sales. E-bay is ideal for little items (10 yellow roof bricks, 6 wheels etc), though I bough mixed bag of 800 g of assorted LEGO as well as one of the vintage (1983) sets and was very happy with both purchases.

If you are not sure what is included (or what should be included) in any particular set, use: http://www.peeron.com/inv/theme/LEGO. On this site a lot of the LEGO sets (going back rather far in the past) are inventoried: you can find out exactly what bricks and widgets are contained in the box you are interested in. Not all sets do have an inventory, but it's worth a try.


I hope you found the review either educational or enjoyable or both - that is it from me, have fun!


--------------------------------------

*The company history info and some factual data on the ranges courtesy of www.lego.com


 
Evaluate this review

How helpful would this review be to someone making a buying decision?

Rating guidelines

Comments about this review
kingbill

kingbill

12.08.2006 10:54

Lengthy review. If you havent heard of lego this is a great review but where on earth have they been. Excellent. I remeber having the lego post office in the 80`s aswell as road and load of random pieces!

Dan_ep

Dan_ep

18.06.2006 19:00

I still love Lego! Used to have a whole lego city when I was a kiddo. Excellent review worthy of an E. Cheers, Dan.

fun2night4us

fun2night4us

14.12.2005 23:14

Wonderful review... brought back fond memories of me playing round with them. lol.. Cheers Dave

Add your comment

max. 2000 characters

  Post comment


Review Ratings
This review of Lego has been rated:

"exceptional" by (46%):
  1. Dan_ep
  2. fun2night4us
  3. kyrane
and 41 other members

"very helpful" by (49%):
  1. kingbill
  2. mumstaxi
  3. lantra
and 44 other members

"helpful" by (4%):
  1. alfeebee
  2. Matavin
  3. femmefatale
and a further member

"off topic" by (1%):
  1. hereonyourown

The overall rating of a review is different from a simple average of all individual ratings.
Products you might be interested in
Lego Mythical Creatures Lego Mythical Creatures
Building & Construction Toy - For ages: 7 Years +
This product has not yet been reviewed. Rate it now
Buy now for only £ 0.01
Meccano
Building & Construction Toy - For ages: 4 Years +
3 reviews
Buy now for only £ 0.98
K'Nex Buddies Set - Bug Eyed K'Nex Buddies Set - Bug Eyed
Building & Construction Toy - K'Nex - For ages: 3 Years +
This product has not yet been reviewed. Rate it now
Buy now for only £ 1.71
Related products on eBay