VVC power and economy in one!
Advantages power, styling handling and MPG
Disadvantages head gasket failour (but not mine)
Detailed Rating
| Road Handling | |
|---|---|
| Comfort | |
| Features | |
| Fuel consumption | |
| Looks |
Sold my MR2 a couple years ago in order to get somthing sensible....however less than a year later i opted for an MGF i wanted somthing light, powerful and that handled well so the MG was my choice.
Able to get around 37MPG and do 0-60 in 7 secs it made perfect sense.The insurance is not to bad for a 24 year old.
Looked at getting the basic 1.8 but it only has 118bhp as apposed to 143bhp the vvc has plus the MPG is the same on both models! due to the VVC making the light car very efficient.Had the car for almost a year with no faults! Head gasket failure is common however mine has done 80k now, i believe MG made some changes in 1999 making HGF less common mines 2000 on a 'w' plate.
Awesome car would reccomend to anyone who wants a decent spec sports car with decent mpg and low running costs.
Attention, this is the first review from this author
Instead of giving a negative rating, consider:

Help this member by giving your advice

Report fraud (for example plagiarism) or other issue with the review to the Ciao support team
Add your comment
Page 1 of 1
| 1 - 4 out of 4 comments
Soho_Black 08/06/2011 07:45
TheHairyGodmother 07/09/2009 16:07
sewbizzie 06/09/2009 20:05
sunmeilan 06/09/2009 19:47
Page 1 of 1
| 1 - 4 out of 4 comments