This camera was bought for me as a gift at Christmas 2001 and since then I have had nothing but trouble with it. The range of feautres is vast, but I don't think any of them add particular value. However, my main complaint is the quality of the pictures - all outdoor pictures (particularly the panaoramic shots) were grainy, dark and out of focus. I had used various films and developers but always with the same results, so I finally concluded the camera must be faulty. I sent the camera back to Minolta, who admitted (after 6 months) that there was a fault with the camera, but that this wasn't responsible for the terrible picture quality. They finally deigned to send me a replacement - the new Vecits 3000 - but charged me £40 for the priviledge. The whole sorry saga has taken 8 months to rectify and left me forty quid out of pocket (not including the money I spent on film and development costs for such low quality photos.) After this experience I would certainly not advise anyone to buy a Minolta camera. I accept that occasionally cameras may be faulty, but the level of customer service I received, the delays, the lack of concern and then the refusal to simply replace the camera free of charge (no cost at all to Minolta) were absolutely unacceptable.
How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines
Hi and welcome to Ciao, a good start, and a shame your present didnt meet its expectations. I bought my hubby a fuji digital camera, and he is quite pleased with it so far., Helen
Flissy 25.02.2003 17:32
Good first op. Sorry you had such a nightmare with this camera.
Fliss
xx
bashful2002 25.02.2003 17:12
good for a first op but be careful with your spellings check it over before you submit it
if you ever want to edit you op go ahead and get people to re-read it, if they re-rate it you will collect more points.
well done
kirsty
helpful by (100%):
