TheGoodSu... 5


Add to my Circle of Trust

Subscribe to reviews

About me:

Member since:28.03.2012


Members who trust:14


Mozilla Firefox

05.05.2012 (22.08.2012)

Performance, speed, usability and functionality, customisation and stability .

None .

Recommendable Yes:

78 Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful See ratings
exceptional by (35%):
  1. K2705
  2. RosesAreRed1207
  3. MsTricia
and 25 other members
very helpful by (62%):
  1. kathboo
  2. trayrope
  3. MikeOCarroll
and 46 other members
helpful by (3%):
  1. mozzie76
  2. sandemp

View all ratings

The overall rating of a review is different from a simple average of all individual ratings.

Share this review on


This review coverís how I heard of Firefox, why I considered it to begin with and how I found its installation. Iíve also included in the review- details of installation and use of Firefox, on Windows and Ubuntu. This includes thirty-two and sixty-four bit Windows operating systems, as well as alternative software to Firefox. Besides that, Iíve covered information about the program, including the newest major feature and basic information about some other programs Iíve used, which are made by Mozilla.

How I heard of it

I first installed Firefox in the dial-up days, the browser was relatively new, and my Internet Explorer was painfully slow. The browser kept freezing, and whenever it worked Ė it was extremely slow. I knew this wasnít a problem with my computer, because everything except Internet Explorer worked as it was supposed to. The poor performance wasnít even due to temporary files, cookies or cache, which I made sure to clean out regularly. As an XP user at the time; I only needed to know one run command (%temp%) to access the junk files, which I would manually delete. I donít think software such as CCleaner Ė existed at the time.

I was recommended Firefox by a friend, so I decided to install it. I was informed that this browser is a lot faster than Internet Explorer, and itís a lot more stable, user friendly and customisable. I found all these claims to be true.


There havenít ever been compatibility issues with installing Firefox, whether on Windows, Linux or other operating systems- in my experience.
The installation is, and has been very short and simple- as long as I can remember it.

As computers progress in sixty-four bit architecture; I believe Firefox can make a few adjustments, or create an alternate compilation for higher processing architectures for Windows users. The Linux distributions of Firefox- are already available in thirty-two and sixty-four bit compilations. I use the Ubuntu Linux Software Centre, which automatically installs the sixty-four bit version- on my Linux computer.

The installation on thirty-two bit Windows is to the %programfiles% directory (Program Files), while on a sixty-four bit Windows, the installation is to %programfiles(x86)% (Program Files (x86)). I never find any problems with Firefox- running on sixty-four bit Windows 7, only the installation is in thirty-two bit format. Sixty-four bit software installís to the %programfiles% directory.

One thing I like about the installer- is that it doesnít install unnecessary adware, or any other programs. Nor does it contain anything else, other than the Firefox installation files. So Iím not prompted to choose toolbar and search engine, which a lot of other freeware installations contain. I donít particularly like, nor do I like their toolbar, so itís always a relief to know that Firefox installation remains free of

Running a new installation of Firefox is fast, and doesnít have to look for any further content updates. But updating an existing installation- sometimes needs to find updates for incompatible addons. I usually find this to be the case with Kaspersky URL advisor, which is an addon that takes some times to update- for the newest stable Firefox builds. Firefox automatically checks for updates, if you click the top left Firefox button, then click Help, and click About Firefox. When an update is available, it can be applied from there. Iíve found this to be a very fast method for updating Firefox, but for me- itís definitely not a substitute to manually downloading the installable file. I always make sure to keep an installer (installation file) saved to disk, so that I can quickly reinstall it after the Windows is reinstalled. I find that the Windows operating system can become a bit corrupt, and could require reinstallation quite often. Thereís no guarantee that it will get corrupt, but the last time I reinstalled Windows- two years ago; was after a week of prior reinstallation.

I never need to keep a Firefox installer for Linux, because Linux is a lot more stable in my experience. Iíve only ever had to reinstall Ubuntu once, which was after a hard drive failed- following a power surge.

Using Firefox on Windows

Iíve found a few performance issues early last year, when Firefox was working a bit slow. I use a sixty-four bit Windows, so I began looking for an alternative to Firefox. I found two alternatives, which are very close to Firefox- in appearance and functionality. Firstly Waterfox, which is a third party sixty-four bit compilation taken directly from Firefox source code. This canít be run parallel to Firefox, as they use the same extensions, cookies, cache and temporary files. The other one is Pale Moon, which can be used in parallel to Firefox, and has its own application data directory.

I found neither Pale Moon, nor Waterfox- suitable to replace Firefox. Other users may find one of those two as a good replacement. I kept Pale Moon installed, and use it quite often along with Firefox. There are some functions, which donít work in Pale Moon. An example is collectively bookmarking all open tabs, which is a useful default feature in Firefox.

Most of the functionality of Firefox- is available in the sixty-four bit Windows alternatives. Even the latest version number of Pale Moon, accurately matches the Firefox build, because its built on the same initial source code, with a few modifications.

Using Firefox on Ubuntu Linux

I found my first install of Firefox on Ubuntu to have the old menu-bar view, which was the default. I right-clicked in the top blank part of the Firefox window and unchecked the Menu-bar feature, which left the window view with the new interface.

Without tweaking, Ubuntu 10.04ís repository has version 3.6 of Firefox and thunderbird. I used Ubuntu Tweak to manually add the up to date installation repository for Mozilla. The version I use is compiled for sixty-four bit architecture computers. Itís installed by default to usr/lib, but the installation can be made portable and customised to the userís needs in Linux. I find the default installation good enough, and the application/user data is easy enough to backup. The procedure is simply to copy the user data folder, which backís up all the data, including all the extensions.

Linux also has alternatives to Firefox, which are very similar in appearance and functionality. Iíve used IceCat, and still use it at times. In my opinion, IceCat isnít as good as Firefox, because Iíve found it to slow down at times and even crash. Although IceCat nearly always works very well, a few hiccups in the program are enough to change a personís

Pictures of Mozilla Firefox
Mozilla Firefox Information
Blue=Updates Red=Tab Groups

Program and Updates

Firefox is one of the applications, made by Mozilla. The software is available to download at, and can also be accessed by typing, which is redirected to the correct page. Downloading the program is very easy, you have to simply visit, and choose the language and operating system, which you wish to download it for.

The latest versions of Firefox have a newer feature, which improves upon the tabbed browsing experience- at least it does so in my opinion. Iíve found the Tab grouping feature to come in very handy for saving a lot of window space for heavy browsing, especially as some of us may be used to opening many unrelated tabs. This feature can be used to quickly put tabs into groups, and even label each tab group. The tab groups button can be access at the top right corner of the browser, this button is next to the window control buttons. The button has a symbol, which is made of four rectangles.


Mozilla has several other projects, which include Thunderbird (an email client), Seamonkey (All-In-One web browser with email and calendar functionalities). I use Thunderbird and Seamonkey, but I donít use Seamonkey as often as I use Firefox, and itís not much of an alternative to Firefox- in my opinion. I havenít used their other software as much, e.g. Lightning and Sunbird, so I canít really say what I know about them; youíll find the little I know from their website at this URL:

My conclusion

Using Firefox for a number of years has given me plenty of time, in which I can get to understand the features, functions, performance and changes in Firefox. Iíve come to the conclusion that Firefox is the best browser overall, whether analysed from a speed point of view, or user customisation, appearance and functionality. Iíve found Firefox, Pale Moon and Safari to run at the highest speeds. I found Firefox, Pale Moon and Chrome to be the best in features and customisation. Iíve found Internet Explorer, Chrome and Maxthon to be rather slow and crash more often. Iíve found Opera to be the mediocre in most cases, except customisation, in which itís not so good. Safari doesnít work on Linux, so I canít give it as high ratings as I give to Firefox. Pale Moonís few limitations in functionality, drop it slightly lower in grade- compared to Firefox. This is the basic theoretic view of why Firefox is my favourite browser, even though I use many browsers.

  Write your own review

Share this review on

  Next review »

Rate this review »

How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines

Rate as exceptional

Rate as somewhat helpful

Rate as very helpful

Rate as not helpful

Rate as helpful

Rate as off topic

Write your own review Write a review and you will earn 0.5p per rating if other members rate your review at least helpful. Write a review and you will earn 0.5p per rating if other members rate your review at least helpful.   Report a problem with this reviewís content

Comments about this review »

K2705 13.03.2013 21:45

Very well reviewed

TheGoodSurveyer 31.08.2012 16:49

Firefox 14 had some major memory management issues, which didn't occur in some of the previous versions, and have been fixed in version 15. I suggest if anyone has performance problems in Firefox 14; update it, because its most likely due to this fault. If you continue to experience problems; see the plugin updater. This should fix the most common performance issues.

RosesAreRed1207 31.08.2012 14:06

It just wouldn't be my first choice, but good review x

Add your comment

max. 2000 characters

Post comment

Product Information Ľ

Product details

Type Internet Browsers

Show all Product Information

More reviews Ľ

Review Ratings Ľ

This review of Mozilla Firefox has been rated:

"exceptional" by (35%):

  1. K2705
  2. RosesAreRed1207
  3. MsTricia

and 25 other members

"very helpful" by (62%):

  1. kathboo
  2. trayrope
  3. MikeOCarroll

and 46 other members

"helpful" by (3%):

  1. mozzie76
  2. sandemp

The overall rating of a review is different from a simple average of all individual ratings.

Are you the manufacturer / provider of Mozilla Firefox? Click here