I feel as if I'm in some hi-tech whirl at the moment, with a new phone, router, netbook and not to m...
I feel as if I'm in some hi-tech whirl at the moment, with a new phone, router, netbook and not to mention all the other stuff that keeps needing replacing, I'm no stranger to Currys etc.
Member since:08.10.2000
Reviews:478
Members who trust:178
The humble CD started out in life as a joint development by Sony and Philips, solely as an audio medium. It wasn’t long though before the computer world, realising that an essentially data disk (after all, that’s what digital music is), with a 650 megabyte capacity could be useful, especially in the field of software delivery. Thus were the CD-ROM drive and disk born, and as most of us are aware, production of the latter is now so cheap that they can arrive in the every day post from firms like AOL and Tiscali, only to be binned (or used as the ubiquitous beer mat at parties!).
Inevitably, it wasn’t long before the clamour to be able to create a record-able version rose up. Initially, these could only write to a ‘CD-R’ disk, known at the time, (although I’ve not heard the phrase lately) as a W.O.R.M. – Write Once, Read Many (Times). As usual, these disks were quite prohibitively expensive, but increased production efficiencies now mean that these can be had with full CD case for as little as 45p. This hardly makes using the re-writable CD-RW worthwhile, as these still cost a few pounds normally.
DVD-ROM was born from a similar sideways process. Incidentally, the V stands for VERSATILE, not Video. The movie industry had been looking for a new medium for the home/rental market to replace relatively costly but lowish-quality VHS tapes, which were prone frequently to damage and jamming when loaned out to a whole host of unknown VCR users. The movie DVD looks like a CD-ROM but looks, as we know, looks can be deceptive. For one thing it has the capacity to be four-sided. Four?! Has BNibbles gone completely ga-ga? Well, for one thing, the occasional DVD is double-sided, meaning that it needs to be turned over half way through, but mercifully I’ve only got one ‘flipper’ in my whole DVD collection. Secondly, the DVD has the capability of having two layers of data on one side, one a conventional ‘shiny’ layer, like a CD-ROM and the other, a semi-transparent one hovering halfway buried in the clear plastic that makes up the outer protection
of the disk. Given that each layer can hold around 4.7 gigabytes of information (although I believe the semi-transparent layer is slightly curtailed), you can see that this is considerably more than the 700 megabytes now standard on CD-R’s. Even a single-layered DVD is nearly seven times larger. Using a DVD-ROM is now not uncommon in the world of PCs. Not only are DVD-ROM readers cheap – I’ve just bought (a good) one for £32, but the disks lend themselves even better to the delivery of large suites of software, encyclopaedia like MS Encarta for instance. They are also ‘backwards-compatible’ with CD-ROMs so they are even more useful, and anyone building or specifying a new PC these days is very unlikely to chose a CD-ROM reader alone.
However, the field of record-able DVD has been slightly more fraught, and at one stage it seemed as if everyone was going to hang back for fear of another ‘Betamax v.VHS format war’. Admittedly, there have now been three major attempts that I know of, to launch a format; DVD-RAM, DVD-R(W) and DVD+R(W) – I’ve put the W in brackets to show that, as with CDs, there is a ‘WORM’ and a re-writable version. DVD-RAM was initially intended to be a computing format, but the latecomers to the arena, –R(W) and +R(W) are also contenders for the home video (VCR replacement). I suppose the good news is that, unlike Betamax and VHS tapes, at least these things are all the same shape, so that, given a sufficiently versatile machine, it should be possible to read/play them all, even if you can only record one of them.
NEC ND-1300A
And this is where I FINALLY get to the point.
I’ve just bought a NEC ND-1300aDVD Re-Writer to put in my latest reincarnation of my PC. Not only can it read all the existing formats of DVD, but unlike the vast majority of its peers, it can actually write to TWO of them, not the more normal one. There is one other maker producing a similar machine at time of writing, Sony, but this is in such heavy demand that it is on very long delivery and/or higher priced.
At £220 for the retail version, complete with recording software bundle, the NEC doesn’t actually, when bought from www.dabs.com, cost much more than a single format recorder. I’m always wary of using the phrase ‘future-proof’ which has in the past proved to be woefully UN-prophetic, but I feel a bit easier about being able to record disks in the two latest formats, both of which should be readable in my domestic DVD player.
I haven’t yet dived into the home DVD-recorder market, but my meagre research does show that Philips seem to have nailed their colours to the DVD+R(W) mast, whereas Panasonic have plumped for DVD-RAM (curiously) and DVD-R. Those who remember Philips’ TWO abortive launches into the video market, with their own initial very bulky video cassette, followed by their double-sided V2000* tape, before giving in and adopting VHS might want to take note. I wonder if that’s the reason these machines are currently the cheapest on the market.
*I think that’s what it was called – I never had one.
FITTING IT
Anyway, back to my NEC machine, which is quite firmly in the PC peripheral camp. Outwardly, you’d think ‘so what?’ after all, it’s just a CD-ROM drive on steroids, isn’t it? It fits in a normal 5.25” drive bay, using the same screws, ribbons and electrical connections. As a reader, it will co-operate with almost anything put into it, CD-Audio, DVD-Movie, DVD-ROM, DVD-RAM, DVD-R(W), DVD+R(W),CD-R(W) and CD-ROM (also a whole host of sub-formats like Interactive).
When it comes to connecting it, I’ve taken the view that it probably needs to be either on its own dedicated IDE cable, or at the very least, the Master drive on that cable. Since I made my hard drives that bit more secure from data corruption by connecting them to a separate RAID card, I can now spare a whole IDE channel for this particular project, so a ribbon to itself, it gets.
The one last connection that I nearly always forget until I’ve screwed the lid back on, is the audio connection for the playback of normal music CDs. This runs from the back of the NEC drive to my Sound Blaster card, which has a clearly marked socket for such things. If your audio-CDs are silent too, maybe I’m not alone after all!
Appearance-wise, the machine looks like any other CD/DVD recorder, although it does only have one LED to show disk activity, whereas I’ve been used to a separate one to show that recording is taking place. It’s also a pity that they couldn’t pick the same ivory colour as all the other items protruding from the front panel of my PC, this being slightly greyer.
WHAT ELSE DO YOU GET?
Being the retail version, rather what is called the ‘OEM’ version, (which effectively means that apart from connectors and four screws, you’re on your own), you also get quite a wide-ranging suite of software, from the latest version of Nero Burning ROM **, to InCD and CinePlayer. InCD is a utility that allows you to treat a blank DVD as a damned great floppy disk so that files can be dragged and dropped to it. Anyone with Windows XP will find this superfluous as Windows Explorer beat them to it.
**There’s got to be a joke in there about ‘fiddling while ROMe burned’, surely?
To get you started, you also get one of each type of record-able disk, i.e. a DVD+R and a DVD+RW, worth about £10 or so, I guess.
SPECIFICATION
Read Speeds All DVD formats, 12x, All CD-ROM formats, 40X
This machine is my first step in producing edited DVD-copies of my own home movies shot on a digital camcorder. The previous VCD video disk standard tended to waste the camcorder’s ability to record around 500 lines of picture detail by squandering it on a mere VHS-quality 280 lines output. A DVD recorder redresses this balance by producing a final product that is as clear as the raw material.
To kick off with, I used the two disks supplied to confirm that the machine works OK. Being Verbatim brand, and supplied by NEC, it was only to be expected that they’d work and they did. It was shortly after this that I began to wonder whether I shouldn’t have waited for the Sony model, however long its delivery was.
What was the problem? Well, none that you could pin on NEC, but the general consensus of opinion on technical websites was that the NEC was fussy when it came to record-able media, and by implication expensive to run. I dare say anyone who is familiar with CD-RW machines will be aware that a useable blank disk may only cost 25p, whilst a reputable branded one bought singly may cost £3 or so. The world of DVD has its equivalent bargain-basement end. It’s just that it seemed that the NEC was having none of it, restricting me to branded, and therefore expensive media.
One little trick I learned very early was to buy a small sample pack of DVD-R media from www.cdr-media.co.uk. This included some ‘budget’ brands, some ‘mainstream’ brands and even some generic unbranded disks. I was slightly heartened by this and by a list I downloaded from a German enthusiast who had apparently made it his life’s work (get a life, Rudi) to assess the tolerance of this machine to cheapo disks! Generally speaking, when something like this happens with a new model, we all sit back and wait for the manufacturer to re-issue the firmware version for the machine.
In NEC’s case, it started to look like holding one’s breath was not feasible. To issue new firmware for the NEC 1300 would allow all those who had spent less on the 1100 single format model a free upgrade to twin-format, annoying loads of ‘legit’ 1300 owners in the process.
Despondency set in, although I had by now identified at least one cheap brand of DVD-R media that worked, the Bulkpaq ‘Green’ Disk, costing around 75p if bought in bulk.
However, all was not lost. Thanks to the efforts of enthusiasts who presumably don’t have girlfriends and never see the light of day except to take delivery of pizzas, new firmware is now available. This increases the machine’s tolerance to a wider range of media. I downloaded this including the utility to ‘flash’ the firmware into the machines BIOS, being careful to record and preserve the existing firmware in case I needed to revert to it.
I don’t suppose NEC would be very receptive to warranty claims if the machine turned up with someone else’s firmware on board!
Incidentally, as a bonus, the new firmware resets the DVD-Movie Region each time, so that you still appear to have 5 'lives' left on reboot. If you don't know what I mean, Windows allows for 5 changes of Region (1 is North America, 2 is Europe and Japan) before locking your DVD player to whatever the fifth choice was. This firmware over-rides that!
In case you're wondering where the hell I dig this stuff up from, go to www.doom9.org.
CONCLUSION
Since updating the firmware, I’ve had no real problems with choice of disk, but I do realise that getting the machine to this state of DVD-Nirvana wouldn’t be everyone’s cup of tea. Even so, if you’re happy to stick to reputable more costly media, then the NEC is a good machine that’s yet to waste a disk (or it is ‘make a beer mat’?). In any case, if your main purpose is to use DVD- or + RWs, (the re-writables) then you probably won’t be buying many disks anyway.
How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines
Great op - I went out and purchased one on the strength of this op and the ones appearing on Ciao Germany. Just a question over Nero - I run 5.5 and whatever the sub-version no. is and have found that the DVD burning wizard doesn't let you choose whether the DVD you burn is multi-session or not (annoying it selects multisesh each time) - have you also had this problem? Mike
Roodles 28.07.2003 09:52
It must be difficult thinking up legal uses for one of these!
Dardalius 22.06.2003 17:40
Most helpful, I'm thinkingof getting one of these but I'll wait just a bit longer... sub £100 by 2004 I think