SHOPPING > Computers > Desktops & Servers > NEC Desktops & Servers > NEC PowerMate VL350 Athlon 64 3000+ 1.8 GHz

NEC PowerMate VL350 Athlon 64 3000+ 1.8 GHz

· Product Information

NEC PowerMate VL350 Athlon 64 3000+ 1.8 GHz

Products you might be interested in »

NEC Express5800 120Mc2 Sony VAIO L-Series All-In-One Touchscreen VPC-L11S1E/S

Sony VAIO L-Series All-In-One Touchscreen VPC-L11S1E/S

PC - All-in-one - RAM: 4 GB - DVD±RW (±R DL) / DVD-RAM / BD-ROM, DVD±RW (±R Double Layer) / DVD-RAM

Rate it now

Buy now for only £ 943.00

NEC PowerMate VL370 Sempron LE-1200 2.1 GHz

NEC PowerMate VL370 Sempron LE-1200 2.1 GHz

PC - Desktop, Tower, Desktop Slimline - RAM: 512 MB, 1 GB, 2 GB - CD-RW / DVD-ROM Combo Drive, DVD±RW (+R double layer), DVD-Writer

Rate it now

Buy Now

Sony VAIO JS-Series All-In-One PC VGC-JS4EF/S

Sony VAIO JS-Series All-In-One PC VGC-JS4EF/S

PC - All-in-one - RAM: 4 GB - DVD±RW (±R Double Layer) / DVD-RAM

Rate it now

Buy now for only £ 776.51

NEC PowerMate VL260 P4 630 3 GHz

NEC PowerMate VL260 P4 630 3 GHz

PC - Tower, Micro Tower - RAM: 512 MB, 1 GB, 256 MB, 2 GB - CD-RW / DVD-ROM Combo Drive, DVD±RW (+R double layer), DVD+RW Double Layer, None, DVD-ROM, CD-ROM

Rate it now

Buy Now

Fujitsu AMILO Desktop Pi 3410

Fujitsu AMILO Desktop Pi 3410

PC - Micro Tower - RAM: 2 GB, 3 GB, 4096 - HDD: 500, 1000 - DVD±RW (+R Double Layer) / DVD-RAM, DVD±RW (+R double layer)

Rate it now

Buy now for only £ 84.33

Similar reviews »

Reviews which might be of interest for "NEC PowerMate VL350 Athlon 64 3000+ 1.8 GHz"

AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ / 3 GHz processor

Advantages: ok
Disadvantages: no

AMD has been on the decline after Intel introduced its core 2 Duo line of processors. It has been late on 65 nm process and they are paying for that. They had the market under total control just one year ago, but now they have lost even their loyal customers. AMD has to produce something very powerful and should be done quickly or they will even lose the small share that they has got. Coming to the processor, Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is a midrange processor ......AMD has been on the decline after Intel introduced its core 2 Duo line of processors. It has been late on 65 nm process and they are paying for that. They had the market under total control just one year ago, but now they have lost even their loyal customers. AMD has to produce something very powerful and should be done quickly or they will even lose the small share that they has got ...

veegopal 19.03.2009 · Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: somewhat helpful
Review of AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ / 3 GHz processor

AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ / 3 GHz processor

Advantages: excellant speed for gaming
Disadvantages: not compatible to all mother boards

AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ / 3 GHz processor is very fast and reliable when compared to other processors which is more costly. AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ / 3 GHz processor is very reliable when we use graphic softwares like photoshop or when we play 3D games which are very resource gulping. AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ / 3 GHz processor will not lag or make you wait when we use large sized digital photos when downloading form digital cameras.I put this into the first computer i built. It can run vertually anything with ease. I am using windows vista x64 ultimate with it, and i have 4GB ram. recommended to anyone. AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ / 3 GHz processor heat systrm is excellent which will not produce heat easly. The computer with AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ / 3 GHz processor is my first computer and I am sing this computer for all my ...

balachandran 01.04.2008 · Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: helpful
Review of AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ / 3 GHz processor

AMD Athlon 64 3500+ 2.2GHz

Advantages: 64-bit future proofed, speedy, excellent value for money
Disadvantages: Dual core AMD 64 CPUS are faster... but hey it would make this CPU cheaper so it's not all bad!

clock speed frequencies i.e. 2.2GHz. This enabled it to run a lot cooler (around 45 degrees Celsius at full load), use a lot less power, and enabled feasible overclocking (that is running a CPU faster than it is intended to be run at) even with the provided heatsink and fan in the retail box. They labelled their CPUs as 3000+ even if it was a 2.2GHz processor to show that it ran at the equivalent speed of Intel's 3GHz CPU. So how does AMD manage to have their CPU's run more efficiently than Intel's even with lower clock speeds? Although a lot of things contribute to it such as cache memory, front side bus and the like, the main thing to effect it is due to the length of the CPU's pipeline. A pipeline is set in stages, and the more stages it has the longer the pipeline is. AMD's Athlon 64 CPU pipeline length is between 12 - 17, whilst ...

china_wolf 04.07.2005 · Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful
Review of AMD Athlon 64 3500+ / 2.2 GHz processor



Are you the manufacturer / provider of NEC PowerMate VL350 Athlon 64 3000+ 1.8 GHz? Click here