Quote-start

Don't forget, cheap price means cheap quality...

Quote-end

2 Apr 26th, 2007 

15 Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful

Advantages:
Great price for a 5 megapixels camera, good battery life, easy to navigate menu

Disadvantages:
Poor picture quality, bad shutter lag,indoor pictures very poor, poor flash and so on .  .  .

Recommendable No:

Detailed rating:

Picture Quality

Range & Quality of Features

Ease of Use

Durability

Overall Look & Design

Value for Money

adicos

adicos

About me:

I am an IT Engineer in London

Member since:26.02.2003

Reviews:29

Members who trust:3

I was a big fan of Nikon, but this Nikon L3 really disappointed me.
I still have a professional, traditional, film Nikon camera and the pictures are just great. I had then a Nikon Coolpix 2100 as a point-and-shoot digital camera and it was absolutely fine. Then in October last year I decided to upgrade the Coolpix 2100 to something better. I thought 5 million pixels would be enough, so I bought a Nikon Coolpix L3, the new generation of Coolpix. Big mistake…

The camera looks great, it has a sturdy, elegant and smooth finish and on paper it has a lot of features:

- 5 megapixels
- Nikkor 3x optical zoom lens (38-116mm in 35mm equivalent)
- Macro focus with AF as close as 1.6 inches
- The D-Lighting function that selects and creates a copy of images with excessive backlight or insufficient flash illumination, adding light and detail wherever needed while keeping other areas as they were
- The Face-priority AF function automatically detects and then focuses in on people’s faces, regardless of where they are in the frame, ensuring superb crisp-focus portraits
- The In-Camera Red-Eye Fix function analyzes each image, automatically finding and then correcting the accidental red-eye that sometimes occurs in flash photography, for more natural-looking portraits.
- You have a choice of 15 different Scene modes – 4 with Scene assist – makes it so much easier to achieve desired results in a wide range of everyday situations.
- Large 2.0-inch glare-resistant color monitor (but NO optical viewfinder), which worked pretty well even if exposed in bright sunlight
- 640x480 @ 30fps movie mode w/sound, length limited only by memory card capacity
- Built-in flash with auto, fill, slow sync, and red-eye reduction
- 23MB internal memory and SD memory card slot (If you have this camera, then buy yourself a 1GB SD card, you can find one now for 15 pounds)
- USB connectivity, PictBridge direct-print compliant
- Powered by two standard AA type batteries (this is what I liked always at Nikon, some of their cameras allow you to use standard AA batteries, so you can never get without a battery just when getting “that special picture”, as you can buy them everywhere

These are the main features, but this review is not about detailing everything the camera has, but rather tell you my experience with it.

The controls and Menu are easy to navigate (for me it was piece of cake, as I had another Coolpix before)

Everything sounded great, then the problems started:

- The pictures are not great at all ! The quality is worse than the Coolpix 2100, a lot of noise and colors did not reflect the real world. Even if modified via a Professional Picture Software, you can tell the quality is not so great. And I can’t afford to spend 30 minutes per picture to get a quality that it should be there delivered by the camera itself
- Is taking forever to take a shoot. You press the button and it takes few seconds to take the picture. And your shoot is gone. We have a 3 years old daughter and we missed so many pictures because of that !
- The flash adds a monumental almost 15-20 seconds between shoots you can take, rendering the camera useless for taking pictures.
- Indoor pictures and low light ones are just rubbish. If I use the flash, is not powerful enough, not even in 2-3 meters (even it says in the features that works up until 3 metres). If I don't use the flash in low light and choose specific scenes, the picture gets blurry. Every time !! Even if using a tripod ! I mean, this is what the camera itself tells me ( the camera has a Blur Warning, which detects camera movement during the exposure, warning you that the image is blurred and giving you the choice of saving the picture or not. If you are satisfied, you can save it; if not, you can retake it with flash or Best Shot Selector on, ensuring that you leave with a better image)
- The movies (which are QuickTime) are OK, but the sound can be affected by the smallest of noise (like wind blowing very-very mild - on the movie it sounds like shooting in a storm…)

Comparing the pictures from the Coolpix 2100 with the L3 you can tell the difference in quality straight away. One is 4 years old, one is “new generation”…

I feel sorry I gave away the 2100, actually, and bought this one.

I am not an amateur in photography and I tried several settings on the camera, changing exposure and brightness, but no success, the pictures are just NOT GOOD. By the way, you can’t modify the ISO sensitivity settings on this Nikon, it just uses the Fully Automatic one, which is not really great.

One really good thing about the L3 was the battery life, with NiMH rechargeable batteries I was able to take over 100 pictures, with around 40% being taken with flash.

But I decided to basically dump the L3 and go get myself a good camera. The only thing is that it was not a Nikon this time. I just lost faith in them. I bought myself a Fuji and is just brilliant, it just shows the Nikon L3 how pathetic its performance is


I actually wrote to Nikon UK (as a coincidence, I live 200 yards from their UK headquarters…) explaining them how bad this camera is. They never replied to me, but now, the L3 is not actually available on their website in the list of products (L4 and L2 are, but they withdraw the L3)

I just hope I helped others to avoid buying this camera, it is literally not worth the money. 

How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines

exceptional

very helpful

helpful

somewhat helpful

not helpful

off topic

Products you might be interested in »

Nikon Coolpix S220

Nikon Coolpix S220

(+) Exellent looks, also read review
(-) picture quality but read the review

User reviews (2)

Buy now for only £ 87.00

Samsung ES60

Samsung ES60

12.2 Megapixel - Memory: Internal and External

User reviews (1)

Buy now for only £ 87.99

Nikon Coolpix S230 Samsung ES55

Samsung ES55

(+) good looking
(-) a bit expensive

User reviews (4)

Buy now for only £ 66.97

Nikon Coolpix P90

Nikon Coolpix P90

(+) Great camera
(-) None that I found,

User reviews (1)

Buy now for only £ 244.95

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ7

(+) panasonic lumix 12x zoom
(-) panasonic lumix 12x zoom

User reviews (11)

Buy now for only £ 214.99

Comments about this review »

gemmellow88 08.12.2009 18:43

Good review. I had basically the exact same problem with a fuji camera (liked the old one, bought the new one and it was worse!) and the company told me 'that was just how the picture quality is'. Other people raved about it and i couldnt understand.

minhhon 03.08.2007 10:46

I thought this only happen in my country...cheap price= cheap quality...thanks for sharing.

oldwasp 26.04.2007 15:35

Great review, shame about the camera. I have got the Fuji F31fd its a great camera.

Compare prices for Nikon Coolpix L3 »

1 offer for Nikon Coolpix L3   sorted by: Price 


More reviews »

Nikon Coolpix L3 - review by guy4159

Advantages: Great photos, compact size and simple to use.
Disadvantages: For the money, there aren't any.

Nikon Coolpix L3 - review by guy4159 guy4159 02.10.2006 (02.10.2006) · Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful
Review of Nikon Coolpix L3

Nikon Coolpix L3 - review by joekavanagh

Advantages: Generally decent quality pictures. small and easy to take everywhere
Disadvantages: Some delay in taking pictures can leave them blurry

Nikon Coolpix L3 - review by joekavanagh joekavanagh 11.05.2007 (11.05.2007) · Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: helpful
Review of Nikon Coolpix L3

Nikon Coolpix L3 - review by Tristan85

Advantages: Great for Amateurs/Newbie in Digital Photography, Compact but Powerful
Disadvantages: Shutter lag and poor video at night

Nikon Coolpix L3 - review by Tristan85 Tristan85 22.08.2006 · Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: helpful
Review of Nikon Coolpix L3

Nikon Coolpix L3 - review by andrew_hobbs92

Advantages: Light, Small, Easy-To-Use
Disadvantages: Not a great zoom, setting take some getting used to

Nikon Coolpix L3 - review by andrew_hobbs92 andrew_hobbs92 07.12.2009 · Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: somewhat helpful
Review of Nikon Coolpix L3



Are you the manufacturer / provider of Nikon Coolpix L3? Click here