I love the Nikon F50. It's the camera I recommend for anyone who wants the best camera possible, and they sell for only $650, including lens. Time moves fast in digital cameras. This F50 is better than the D1H for which I paid $4,000 in 2002 and didn't even come with a lens.
The F50 is especially ... Read review
Filter Size: 52mm50mm f1.41.High-speed normal lens 2.Great for travel and for shooting ... more
full-length portraits in available light 3.Distortion-free images with superb resolution and colour rendition 4.Provides high-contrast images even at maximum aperture
(+) Fold out LCD screen, Image Stabilization, Zuiko lens quality, Picture quality, Flash options (-) Noise in low light, Too many buttons, Badly laid out, Too many gimmicks
Advantages: great price Disadvantages: It's not the new D80 but it's a great camera for the price
I love the Nikon F50. It's the camera I recommend for anyone who wants the best camera possible, and they sell for only $650, including lens. Time moves fast in digital cameras. This F50 is better than the D1H for which I paid $4,000 in 2002 and didn't even come with a lens.
The F50 is especially good for kids, sports and action compared to more expensive fixed-lens cameras. I prefer it over everything else from other makers because ... ...immediately to your inputs and the image quality is fantastic. The F50 is a far cry better than any fixed-lens camera, even the much more expensive Sony DSC-R1. Unless you really understand abstract concepts like White Balance fine tuning you'll never find anything missing from the F50. Don't let the low price fool you: it's a great camera and I wouldn't be able to tell the difference between prints from a D50 compared to a $5,000 D2X. I've seen ... more
I love the Nikon F50. It's the camera I recommend for anyone who wants the best camera possible, and they sell for only $650, including lens. Time moves fast in digital cameras. This F50 is better than the D1H for which I paid $4,000 in 2002 and didn't even come with a lens.
The F50 is especially good for kids, sports and action compared to more expensive fixed-lens cameras. I prefer it over everything else from other makers because it's so easy to use, works fast, focuses fast, responds immediately to your inputs and the image quality is fantastic. The F50 is a far cry better than any fixed-lens camera, even the much more expensive Sony DSC-R1. Unless you really understand abstract concepts like White Balance fine tuning you'll never find anything missing from the F50. Don't let the low price fool you: it's a great camera and I wouldn't be able to tell the difference between prints from a D50 compared to a $5,000 D2X. I've seen 4 x 5 foot enlargements from the D50 that look superb. The only limit to the F50's picture quality is the photographer, not the F50.
The F50 is fantastic at high ISOs, giving completely smooth and clean images at ISO 800.
Overall GREAT camera. I don't regret buying mine :)
Advantages: Absolutely perfect for beginners and improvers,Lightweight,ease of use,nikon build quality,opporunity to use vast range of nikkor optics Disadvantages: no auto bracketing, no cable release screw
I was bought a Nikon F50 as a christmas present six years ago... and I was dissapointed to say the least! why? well after using Canons excellent EOS 600 for the previous 5 yrs, any camera would have to be pretty good to match up. Well after 6 years of use and abuse I have to say that it has NOT dissapointed. I have taken shots in the heat and humidity of Florida in August and have succesfully sold shots taken in the middle of a scottish winter with ... ...only 10 secs and any vibrations ( from mounting on a tripod )will have settled down. All in all the Nikon F50 has been a joy to own and use, in fact I am seriously considering a second hand body as a back up. So if you see one..GRAB IT! ...
Stew1e 05.05.2003
· Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: helpful Review of Nikon F 50
Advantages: Rugged, Good built in flash, Nikon lenses Disadvantages: Motor wind-e- a bit crap!
...nikon! Well welcome to the nikon F50, old yet reliable. The exposure is first rate and I can't fault it in any situation even when used with the cameras built in flash. However there are a few problems which I have encountered, when I brought the camera the sales assistant told me that I could take frames up to 1 a second hmmm, o.k maybe on a good day but in general the camera seems a little slow in the motor wind-e- section, the AF is very good ...
jyardley 23.07.2000
· Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: somewhat helpful Review of Nikon F 50
Picture Quality
Range & Quality of Feat...
Ease of Use
Overall Look & Design
Value for Money
Similar reviews »
Reviews which might be of interest for "Nikon F 50"
Advantages: great quality, low price, prime Disadvantages: none
As anyone interested in photography will know - lenses don't come cheap, especially quality lens, except this one.
The 50mm 1.8 has a reputation for quality at a reasonable price and it's a reputation well deserved.
Yes the 50mm is a 'small' lens but it's a prime lens.
Some may find that the need for them to move forwards or backwards to get the correct composition for a photograph is too irritating to make the purchase worthwhile over that of a zoom lens but the increase of quality combined with the price makes that an opinion that I beg to differ.
If you shoot portraits, or are looking to start then the 50mm 1.8 will prove an invaluable piece of equipment, but it's uses are not limited to portraits only.
At 1.8 the 50mm is a fast lens however it dies have a counterpart - the 50mm 1.4. The 1.4 is, by comparison, alot more expensive ...
Advantages: Perfect for photographers on a "budget" Disadvantages: Does not autofocus on D40, D40x
This is a "prime lens" meaning it has a fixed focal length unlike the typical zoom lens. This is probably one of the best lenses out in the market. Often called the "nifty fifty", it's perfect for family photos, portraiture or low light.
It is very cheap but has a good quality build. The reason for this is that it has fewer moving parts than your typical zoom lens. The downside you'll need to move about to compose your photos but this can be an advantage if you're on a learning curve. It helps you to become aware of your surroundings rather than just lazily zooming on a particular subject.
It only cost £120 which is perfect for photographers on a "budget". This lens also works on both digital and film cameras.
The quality of the pictures produced by this lens cannot be justified by just looking at samples. If you have a Nikon ...
Advantages: Size,weight, fast max f stop, nikon quality Disadvantages: non
I have a 70mm to 300mm Sigma zoom and a 28mm to 80mm sigma zoom and this small standard 50mm lens.
The lens costs about £90 new or around the £50 on E Bay.
For everyday photography, I don't think it can be beaten.
The two main advantages are its size and its maximum aperture of f1.8. For the peeps that don't know anything bout photography....the smaller the no. on the lens, the more light it can let in...hense f1.8 being better for available light photography indoors than the f5.5 on one of my zoom lenses.
The small/lightweight standard lense on your camera will drastically reduse the risk of blurred pictures due to 'camera shake' because a zoom lense makes the camera more unstable and magnefies any camera shake..the bigger the zoom the worse it is.
This smallness coupled with being able to use the high aperture to let ...