Palm Tungsten vs Ipaq, sayonara Ipaq
10 of 10 Ciao Users found the following review helpful
()
Advantages small, fast, sexy, best palm ever
Disadvantages relatively high price
I never thought I would make the case for a palm handheld from 3com. I used to be a dedicated Ipaq fan but got increasingly disappointed with it. So I decided to take a bold step and try out the new Palm Tungsten. In one word: AMAZING! I will compare, wherever possible the Tungsten with the Ipaq. Note that I am comparing the new Tungsten with my previously owned Ipaq 3850.
For exact specifications of both PDA's I refer you to the www.palm.com and www.compaq.comLook and feel
I always found the Ipaq sexy, but it is still a bit bulky. The Palm is not much lighter (6.2 oz vs 5.6 oz for the palm), but much smaller (length 4'' vs 5'' for the Ipaq). This is due to the fact that the bottom slides open to reveal the grafiti writing area. The garfite colored aluminium casing feels much more sturdy than the aluminium looking, though plastic (!) casing of the Ipaq. I think overall the Ipaq used to be the sexiest PDA around, but the Tungsten has certainly taken that no.1 spot. I think the Tungsten also has a much more professional look. It lies very good in your palm and the stylus comfortably expands to reveal a pen sized stylus. Very easy to handle. The only minus is the plastic protection cover, which is quite handy but scrathes easily.
Memory
The memory of the Palm is obviously much less than of the Ipaq (16mb vs 64mb!). However you don't need more given the different operating systems. Actually 16mb for a palm is relatively much more than 64mb for the Ipaq. Palm applications are so small that 16mb is more than enough. Moreover, both the palm and Ipaq have SSD/MMC expansion slots, so the storage possibilities are infinite
Software
I still think there are more software applications for the palm than for the ipaq, although pocket pc software is catching up fast. Applications for pocktepc are sexier, ie better graphics, more functionality etc. The palm applications are simpler but that is perhaps also the beauty of it.
hand writing recognition
This was actually my biggest surprise of all. I dreaded the fact that I had to go back to learning palm grafiti which is not that close to my actual handwriting.
Attention, this is the first review from this author
Instead of giving a negative rating, consider:

Help this member by giving your advice

Report fraud (for example plagiarism) or other issue with the review to the Ciao support team
Add your comment
Tricity 11/02/2004 17:06
runonthespot 28/07/2003 18:19
I agree. A Very Sexy piece of kit. Only thing I can think of that I want more is the Tungsten C, or perhaps the Tungsten T2... Beats the pants of the Ipaq at any rate!
Briz_Hatchings 08/05/2003 20:20
A very useful comparison. No need to worry about the length. Although more informative, long ops get really tedious. Conciseness is the key.
Bubba77 13/01/2003 13:10
ponty 30/12/2002 21:15
Nice to see someone defecting from PocketPC to Palm :) Lovely comparative op, I'll post my own (comparative to existing Palms) when I've had it long enough to discover any bad features :)
|
Truvativ Chainring MTB 33t 4 Bolt 104mm BCD Alu Tungsten Grey 3x10 Truvativ Chainring MTB 33t 4 Bolt 104mm BCD Alu Tungsten Grey 3x10 |
amazon marketplace sports
|
Shipping: Free! Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days |
|
C.K. Side Cutter Tungsten Carbide T3779 For Hard Wire Uses Oval Head |
amazon marketplace homeimprovement
|
Shipping: £4.02 Availability: Usually dispatched within 4-5 business days |