Panasonic DMR-EH 52 EG-S

Author's product rating:   

Picture Playback	Excellent
Sound Level	Good
Range of Features	Above Average
Durability	Good
Value for Money	Good

Advantages:	: )
Disadvantages:	just reed review

Recommend to potential buyers:

yes

Full review

Why I did place estimation 10? Because I evaluate this apparatus not as the superd-move in the technology specialist, who snobbishly cavils to any nonsense or who requires aerobatics from "in all, that shevelitstsa", namely as user - Private, but ACTUALLY STUDIED everything (well or almost everything) possibilities, which are opened before the user and that, with what quality this realizes. The mass of the analyzed theoretical information, and also the opinions of the number of people, which manage other recorders, allowed me to compose the sufficiently clear picture: 65-1 Panasonik - ACTUALLY CONFRONTING THING!!! And not because to me it transported him to purchase on the action in all for 13200 r. in Novokuznetsk, but because it, purchased also on 3-4 thousand is more expensive, it will cost its money. Unfortunately, most frequently in the opinions to any technology people is limited to some general sensations or estimation of the parameters trivial in private life. I will try to decorate my analysis with real "chips". Thus: 1. Mul'tiformatnost' - this is very convenient and not it is characteristic of the majority of other recorders. 65-1 write also on "+", and on "-", and on R, and represent to RW., in you let us assume it writes only "pluses", and you they asked to throw down something they gave "minus". Here - without the difference! It noticed, which is written somewhat more rapidly to the padders, then preliminary formatting does not be required on minuses R and then on other recorders minus disks better behave with the search according to the chapters, but this - sufficiently important thing! In two my friends respectively BBK and SONY with ZHD to 250 Gb (model I do not remember, I know that they are purchased for 12500 and 16000 r.). They - "not multi". 2. complete russification. This factor became one of that meant with the selection between English-language Philips and 65- m. In the reality you use apparatus with the interruptions, it is possible to partially forget some commands, but once more instruction you will not open with the Russian menu! 3. class, convenient, remarkable, intuitively intelligible interface, which makes it possible to associate with the recorder without the problems. On which 4? I do not know, as the dormouse, but in BBK does not have similar: the list of records can be looked in two versions: to derive 9 lines from the record moving by the picture, on which cursor or 6 picture- records simultaneously. When in the memory tens of records are contained, the search for necessary without this visual interface will be complex. Here everything - is brilliantly simple to the impossibility: you turn over the pages records, as if page in the album. Records can be sorted out on the parameters (names, date, number and others.) 4. there are many joints. In me the recorder is connected by skartami with the "duet" LG and by television set, which ensures two-way communication and all versions of record from the disk to the cassette and vice versa and so forth and the like the third entrance (tulip) from behind is connected with the computer, which is also usefully, when video from kompa is desirable to enter on DVD. from the front panel I I connect video camera or camera. The dormouse of my comrade skartov does not have generally. 5. ease of installation and administration of all functions. Already he wrote about russification 4. But here is an even more significantly fact: its to husband I learned to write a timer each in 5 minutes, and to mount finished record - for 10! I read instruction BBK on the part of the installation: this is something with something! Can, in practice and so not all zaputanno, but my friend, until now, in 4 months, so was not dismantled at his Chinese. By the way, he in it began to already glyuchit' - problem with the disk drive (it is fussy about food). It is going to try to return those spent by 12500. I pass to the parameters of quality and functionality. About the "picture" already it is written well, I will stop at "chips. 6. regime FR ("flexible record"). This simply super-!!! To usual ingot it is possible to write down in the normal modes 1 hour (regime XP), 2 hours (SP), 4 hours (LP), 6 and 8 it is hour (regime EP). Yes, in Son'ke of regimes it is more. There are regimes 1,5 - 2,5 - 3 hours, which makes it possible to more accurately set the quality of record in the dependence on its duration. But there is no regime "flexible record". In this regime For panasoniku it is necessary to assign the speed of writing (for example, the cassette with a length of 1 hour 45 min.) and to include record FR record to the hard disk will be executed with such calculation, what its volume will be equal to 4,7 Gb - i.e. it is equal to the capacity of ingot!!! Thus, regime FR allows optimally, i.e., with a maximally possible quality, to write down the program of any (to 8 it is hour) duration!!! It did not hear about this regime in other recorders, therefore, if it where there is, then I RECOMMEND! 7. record in regime LP (4 hours) in the usual recorders is produced with the development of 250 lines. However, Panasonik ensures the development of 500 lines and LP- regime it issues the very good quality of picture! 4 it I use, when I write ether (cinema any). Then that which is desirable to preserve, I free from the advertisement (conveniently lying on the sofa, clicking by panel) and I roll to the disks. Those, who them then look, claims to the quality do not think to present. 8. quality of installation. The owner of dormouse very strongly complained, that after installation in it unavoidably at the joints of fragments float "residual" personnel. This is simple misfortune some. Represent, they removed advertisement, and in the site of joint its piece into the half seconds suddenly remains! In me such pieces sometimes jump out with the first girder of the recently made glueing and disappear with the second. Subsequently, in such cases and after rerecording to ingot - there is nothing such in the mention. T.k. I made the already enormous number of archive installed records, then I can say accurately: there does not exist in Panasonika of this problem! 9. noise suppressing oscillator of external signal. This is declared in the description and actually it works. the "roughness" of image with the rerecording of the old cassette through the analog entrance a little decreases. Record becomes pochetche. Trifle, but it is very pleasant, especially when you copy videoarkhivy! 10. in contrast to the dormouse, my Panasonik is capable of working with the photographs, to make albums, to write the disks of the dual content. It has a slot for SD- maps. In me the camera of the model of dormouse from Memori-Stik, but is kartrider. With the aid of "working" SD- map it is possible from kompa to transfer any fotki to the hard disk and to do there with them everything which will deem necessary. 10 points of nakatal, but sensation is such, that forgot something. And this something, if actually he forgot, will be only positive. On the whole, resume: selecting recorder, I studied the mass of information from the Internet, even it drew off instructions. Because of the mass it is plus, then theoretical, selected Panasonik. Only rad to this!!! If there is everything, about which I wrote, in other apparatuses - it is noticeable. But I think that, after purchasing Panas, and you will not be deceived in its expectations. By the way, 55-4 models have only 3 differences from my: no HDMI- port, it does not read MPEG-YA and hard disk not 250, but 160 Gb. Price - on 1,5-2 thousand is less. In principle, capacity into 160 Gig to me it would be sufficiently. Only time there was such filling, when 4 for long it did not clean contained ZHD. If whom this entire information helps in the selection, I will be rad! Yes, by the way: purely my opinion, but the design of the recorders of this rule Of panasonik, in my opinion, is simply best - elegant, not massive, original and together with this not fanciful forms.