 AMD Athlon 64 3500+ 2.2GHz
Review of AMD Athlon 64 3500+ / 2.2 GHz processor by
china_wolf
Advantages: 64-bit future proofed, speedy, excellent value for money
Disadvantages: Dual core AMD 64 CPUS are faster... but hey it would make this CPU cheaper so it's not all bad!
...leading industry rivals Intel and AMD (you know them right?) started to make their CPU's use smaller, more efficient manufacturing processes. Making the core of the CPU smaller and more compact meant less heat would be generated, and the closer contacts would pass information more quickly.
But that's as much in common both the CPU companies had with each other, as their other methods of manufacturing and selling their CPUs differ immensely. Intel ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average very helpful
|
| Speed |
 |
| Ease of Installation |
|
| Manufacturer Support |
|
| Instruction manual |
|
| Value For Money |
|
|
very helpful
04.07.2005
|
AMD Athlon 64 processer 3500+ 2.20GHZ
Review of AMD Athlon 64 3500+ / 2.2 GHz processor by
lechy
Advantages: Works with non 64 bit operating systems and software
Disadvantages: Cant think of any!
I bought this about a year ago I think, and have had no problems with it, on my A8V Deluxe motherboard which the cpu fits into the socket 939 no problems, it works outstandingly well with windows vista x64, if you have enough memory that is, I have my self 2 giga bytes of memory. I would guess that with less memory it would work fine, but Im using the Windows Vista Ultimate 64 bit edition(which obviously requires more memory because of the extra features ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
| Speed |
|
| Ease of Installation |
 |
| Manufacturer Support |
 |
| Instruction manual |
|
| Value For Money |
|
|
helpful
06.07.2007
|
Powerful CPU
Review of AMD Athlon 64 3500+ / 2.2 GHz processor by
appollo2006
Advantages: Powerful runs Windows Vista
Disadvantages: None
Ive had this CPU for over a year. I have the older 939 socket version but both cpu's are the same. This CPU has performed extremely well, it runs cool and in comjunction with cool and quiet technology this means your PC will run quiter. This is great for gaming, word-processing and anything else you can think of. I have used this processor with Windows Vista Ultimate edition and it runs it smooth and is fast. This CPU has also dropped in price a lot ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
| Speed |
|
| Ease of Installation |
|
| Manufacturer Support |
|
| Instruction manual |
|
| Value For Money |
|
|
helpful
16.07.2007
|
Go Quick----Go AMD
Review of AMD Athlon 64 3500+ / 2.2 GHz processor by
darrensmith016
Advantages: Fast, A-head of time!!!
Disadvantages: A bit of the pricey side.
...smoke.
It really good that AMD have gone beyond Intel, making a 64 bit processor....to bad the OS isn't up to spec!!! Hurry Windows before AMD release a 128 bit processor.
This processor can run any windows OS, its flexable, quick and relable. You can leave this processor on for weeks without problems.
The only problem would be that its only clocked at 2.2ghz.
The box is a normal sized processor box, within the box you have the standard ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average somewhat helpful
|
| Speed |
|
| Ease of Installation |
|
| Manufacturer Support |
|
| Instruction manual |
 |
| Value For Money |
|
|
somewhat helpful
22.09.2005
|
 AMD Athlon 64 3500+ 2.2ghz processor
Review of AMD Athlon 64 3500+ / 2.2 GHz processor by
francissmith76
Advantages: Very quick and responsive, easy to install and lots of available cooling fans.
Disadvantages: It's not dual core so it struggles sometimes when milti-tasking
...as an upgrade to an amd 64 3000+ 1.8ghz.
to be honest, i didnt expect much of a speed improvement, but the 400mhz extra from the 3000+ really provides an excellent speed boost. I do a multi media and design course at college so i use Flash and photoshop software alot, along with demanding video editing software, and this processor has boosted rendoring times and graphics to no end!
I play games, and i have found that this processor will handle ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average somewhat helpful
|
| Speed |
|
| Ease of Installation |
|
| Manufacturer Support |
|
| Instruction manual |
|
| Value For Money |
|
|
somewhat helpful
12.02.2007
(06.06.2007)
|
GOOD PERFORMANCE FOR CHEAPER PRICE
Review of AMD Athlon 64 3500+ / 2.2 GHz processor by
memekbau
Advantages: GOOD WORKS IN 3D GAME'S AND SOFTWARE'S ENVIRONMENT
Disadvantages: EASLY HOTTER AND WORKS NO IN MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE IN SEVERAL MAINBOARD'S BRANDS
...software especially when rendering,before use AMD Athlon 64 3500+, for do that things I must need more time and find more problems, but after use That processor,I'm very glad,it produces good performance in rendering ,needs no more time again to produce high 3D Pictures and while playing the 3D games more interactive,lifely,smooth movement with best performance,but be carefull this product works no too good in several mainboard's brands and types,it's ...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average somewhat helpful
|
| Speed |
|
| Ease of Installation |
|
| Manufacturer Support |
|
| Instruction manual |
|
| Value For Money |
|
|
somewhat helpful
20.10.2007
|
Are you the manufacturer / provider of AMD Athlon 64 3500+ / 2.2 GHz processor? Click here
|
|
| 
This product has not yet been reviewed. 
