ProAbout £5.00 a month. Increased "range" between ref...
ContraIt's not subtle you will see exactly what comes ou...
ProEnvironmentally friendlier, healthier, cheaper
Proeco-friendly, low cost long term, easy t use
Contramessy and at times awkward
ProEconomical, environmentally-friendly, convenient
ContraNone unless you are ultra squeamish
ProSafer, more comfortable, greener and cheeper
ContraTakes a few goes to get the hang of it
Proenvironmentally friendly, healthy, cheap
Contrajust not comfortable for me
ProCheaper than conventional methods!
ContraFiddly, painful, inconvenient, difficult to get cl...
ProEnvironmentally friendly. Cheaper. Lowers risk of ...
ContraUncomfortable to wear. Difficult to remove. Messy.
ProEnvironmentally friendly, very long potential usag...
ContraInitial cost, Yuck factor
ProBetter for the environment, Cheaper in the long ru...
ContraSome might find it 'iccky', Expensive to buy (£17....
ProCheaper, greener, safer than alternative means of ...
ContraPotential for a bit of mess and more hassle, the "...
Pro GREENER, HEALTHIER, CHEAPER AND NO LEAKS!
Contra TAKES A LITTLE GETTING USED TO!
ProSaves money, long-lasting, comfortable, hygienic, ...
ContraSteep learning curve, but only for the first few t...
ProCheap in the long run, enviromentally friendly, 'e...
ContraCan take some practice, sqeamish ladies may have t...
Procheaper, better for the environment, reusable