Nikon Coolpix S220

...of life. But Canon, Nikon and Sony has always captured my imagination for churning out best cameras one after another which of course is a healthy sign for consumer. Because competition ought to lead to reduction in price and improved quality. Nikon Coolpix S 220 is a reasonably good camera considering its price. I don’t think that pros or for that matter serious amateurs will really be hankering to own it. For every body I must say it’s a cool ...
...and negetives of the sexy Nikon Coolpix S 220:'''' '''''Pros:'''' Ultra-stylish design, small and light, good feature set for asking price and range of cool colors, including red, black, magenta, purple and several shades of silver (I loved these) and blue. It measures 18 mm to the thickest and weighs 100g. ''''Cons:'''' Patchy flash, image quality is merely adequate It is equipped with 2.4”LCD screen Nikon introduces its own get-the-faces-right ...

roktimdutta 16.06.2009 · Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful
Review of Nikon Coolpix S220

I purchased this camera for my daughter in blue for her birthday and she immediately loved the color and the size of the camera. The problem was the picture and the video quality. The pictures were coming out grainy and showed up with rainbow dots. The video she took had visible pink stripes and also rainbow dots showing up. I was not satisfied with this camera, so I returned it within a few days. I was surprised that this camera had poor image quality ...
...would not recommend this camera. Poor image quality outweighs the good qualities of this camera. High levels of jpeg artifacting coupled with medium levels of chromatic abberation result in image sharpness and contrast lower than that of a 2 megapixel camera, save your money. Do not buy this camera. surprisingly bad for Nikon. ...

shaun989 15.06.2009 · Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: helpful
Review of Nikon Coolpix S220