Quote-start

An excellent-sounding classic stereo amp

Quote-end

5 Jul 8th, 2007 

10 Ciao members have rated this review on average: helpful

Advantages:
Excellent sound, low noise, great headroom, bass is rock solid

Disadvantages:
Could use some more input options, but expected for its age

Recommendable Yes:

Detailed rating:

Sound Quality

Ease of Use

Look & Design

Range of Features

Value for Money

Hal_the_Stereo_Nut

Hal_the_Stereo_Nut

About me:

A music aficionado, I look for clean, accurate reproduction in stereo equipment. In my photography,...

Member since:08.07.2007

Reviews:2

This is one of the best sounding amplifiers I've ever heard. Yes, yes, amplifiers are not supposed to "sound" like anything - they're supposed to be a straight wire with gain. However, I just enjoy listening to this amp more than any I have (and I have several a few times more powerful than this). I'm playing mostly CDs through a pair of Boston A70's or a pair of old Mirage 450's, and it seems they definitely like each other.
It's very reminiscent in overall sound quality, capability and sheer effortlessness to my friend's Harmon Kardon 730 some 30 years ago - a sound I've never forgotten.
This amp seems much bigger than 41 watts. It's very, very clean, has tremendous (but accurate) presence in the bass when the material calls for it and is really a joy to listen to.
I needed to open it up to de-oxidize some of the switches and potentiometers as they were scratchy or one channel cut out occasionally. The large heat sinks and the substantial transformer inside the case tell the story - this was built to a higher standard that most. Once the controls were deoxidized and worked back and forth to clean them, I let it sit overnight to allow the spray to dry. It sounds and works like new.
I'm sure the original owner must have agonized over getting rid of it, but I was able to pick it up at a thrift shop for $15, plus $10 for a can of deoxidizing lubricating spray (good for another 40 amps or so) and his loss is my gain.
I certainly didn't need yet another piece of stereo equipment in my house, but this "felt" so substantial I needed to buy it. I'm very happy I did. My wife, less so.
On the CON side: It would be nice if it had more input possibilities, but when it was made, what was there other than a tuner, phono and a couple of tape decks?
Summary: IF you can get your hands on one of these (and apparently they're exceedingly rare) then do so, and rediscover some of your favourite listening materials. 

How helpful would this review be to a person making a buying decision? Rating guidelines

exceptional

very helpful

helpful

somewhat helpful

not helpful

off topic

Products you might be interested in »

Technics SU-C 1010

Technics SU-C 1010

Amplifier - Width:430 mm - without Dolby / DTS

Rate it now

Buy Now

Fatman Itube 182 WITH Valvedock

Fatman Itube 182 WITH Valvedock

Amplifier - Width:382 mm - RMS Wattage:18 - without Dolby / DTS

Rate it now

Buy now for only £ 199.95

Technics SU-A 707

Technics SU-A 707

Amplifier - Width:430 mm - RMS Wattage:55 - without Dolby / DTS

Rate it now

Buy Now

NAD C 315 BEE

NAD C 315 BEE

Amplifier - Width:435 mm - RMS Wattage:40 - without Dolby / DTS

User reviews (1)

Buy now for only £ 159.00

Technics SUV 670

Technics SUV 670

Amplifier - Width:430 mm - RMS Wattage:80 - without Dolby / DTS

User reviews (1)

Buy Now

Pioneer A209R

Pioneer A209R

Amplifier - Width:420 mm - RMS Wattage:60 - without Dolby / DTS

User reviews (1)

Buy now for only £ 38.99

Comments about this review »



More reviews »

Technics SU7300 - review by Benco

Advantages: looks , build , sound
Disadvantages: connections

Technics SU7300 - review by Benco Benco 16.09.2008 (16.09.2008) · Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: somewhat helpful
Review of Technics SU7300



Are you the manufacturer / provider of Technics SU7300? Click here