...
A Triumph Herald 12/50, in lovely gleaming white, matching white colour-coded rubber bumpers, with a canvas slide-back sunroof, and to top it all, a RADIO.
This was nirvana for a 15-year-old boy heavily into the Beatles, the Rolling Stones, and all the popular music of the time, and a vast ... Read review
Advantages: Ahead of its time Disadvantages: Handled very poorly. Slow.
...on the doorstep.
A Triumph Herald 12/50, in lovely gleaming white, matching white colour-coded rubber bumpers, with a canvas slide-back sunroof, and to top it all, a RADIO.
This was nirvana for a 15-year-old boy heavily into the Beatles, the Rolling Stones, and all the popular music of the time, and a vast improvement on the old Dansette transistor radio that had sat on the dashboard of the old Anglia, which had truly dreadful reception. ... ...
~ ~ The Triumph Herald first took to the roads in 1959, and was to have a very successful twelve-year production run until the final car rolled out of the factory in 1981. It was a stylish car for its day, having been conceived by an Italian designer called Michelotti.
It’s attractive exterior disguised somewhat the rather dated technology used by Triumph in its manufacture. By this period most other car manufacturers had adopted a ... more
~ ~ When I was a teenager back in 1963, the first car my father ever bought was an old Ford Anglia in which I learned my basic driving skills. Three years later it was traded in, and a brand spanking new car arrived on the doorstep. A Triumph Herald 12/50, in lovely gleaming white, matching white colour-coded rubber bumpers, with a canvas slide-back sunroof, and to top it all, a RADIO. This was nirvana for a 15-year-old boy heavily into the Beatles, the Rolling Stones, and all the popular music of the time, and a vast improvement on the old Dansette transistor radio that had sat on the dashboard of the old Anglia, which had truly dreadful reception.
~ ~ In those days cars still had to be “run in”, and great care was taken for the first thousand miles, with no heavy strain being put on the engine, and the top speed limited (by father’s decree) to an absolute maximum of 45mph. I loved the Herald with a passion, and I washed and polished it so often I’m surprised I didn’t rub away the paintwork. There was a mile of private road at the golf club we lived at in Dunbar in Scotland, and this meant that I could drive the car with impunity from prosecution from the police, something I took advantage of at every possible opportunity. My father also used to take me for runs out into the country lanes, so I was already an experienced driver by the time I passed my driving test in 1968. (In the Herald)
~ ~ The Triumph Herald first took to the roads in 1959, and was to have a very successful twelve-year production run until the final car rolled out of the factory in 1981. It was a stylish car for its day, having been conceived by an Italian designer called Michelotti. It’s attractive exterior disguised somewhat the rather dated technology used by Triumph in its manufacture. By this period most other car manufacturers had adopted a solid shell construction method, but the Herald still had a separate chassis to which the body panels were subsequently bolted and welded. This bolt-on arrangement had its advantages though, as you were able to lift the whole front section of the car, wings, bonnet, and front grille, by simply unclipping two hinges on the wings. This gave you total access to the engine for maintenance purposes, and made working on the engine very easy. The Herald was also the inspiration behind Triumph’s successful sports car, the Spitfire, which I wrote a review about recently. If you look at the pictures on both reviews, you’ll see the remarkable similarity. The Spitfire was even built using the Herald chassis, and fitted with Herald engines!
~ ~ The original four-cylinder, single carburettor, 948cc engine was a leftover from the old Standard 10, and served the Herald well from 1959 to 1961, when Triumph introduced the more powerful Herald 1200, twin-carburettor model. The model that we owned, the Herald 12/50, was released in 1964, and in its turn was replaced by the Herald 13/60 in 1967. The model numbers (12/50 and 13/60) related to the engine size and the maximum brake horsepower of the engine. Hence the Herald 12/50 had a 1200cc engine, and could achieve 50bhp, while the faster 13/60 models had a 1300cc engine, and could manage 60bhp.
~ ~ It was never a fast car, even in its later “sporty” 13/60 guise. The original 948cc engine could only manage a top speed of 73mph, and took a staggering 30 seconds to wind up to 60mph. The larger 1200cc models could achieve a top speed of 80 mph, and took 23 seconds to reach the 60mph mark. The Herald 12/50 was a wee bit faster, with a top speed of 81mph, and a 0 to 60mph time of 20 seconds. And the 13/60 was the fastest Herald of all, with a top speed of 85mph, and taking only 17 seconds to reach sixty. Fuel consumption was fairly consistent throughout the whole model range, at between 28 to 31mpg. In later years, a convertible version was introduced, which enhanced its “sporty” image, and Triumph even brought out a van version called the “Courier” for a two-year period in the early 1960’s.
~ ~ The Herald was a lovely car to drive, despite handling like a dog! It was the first British made car to have independent spring suspension on the rear, and telescopic dampers on all four wheels. This meant that it rode very smoothly on the road, which wasn’t common on cars of the time. The drawback to the “soft” suspension was its alarming tendency to lurch and lean into corners if you took them at any sort of speed. It also meant it was remarkably easy to put the car into a rear wheel skid, until you got used to its limitations. I can still recall nearly giving my late mother heart failure (she was a nervous, back-seat driver) when I lost the rear end in the wet one day while out for a spin in the country, and turned the car through a complete 360-degree circle! She wouldn’t let me go over 30mph for the rest of the journey. (Heh, heh) It had a four-speed gearbox, with very good torque (pulling power) in second and third gears. Second gear in particular was very nippy, and you could get nearly 50 mph at full revs! There was no synchromesh on first gear, which meant you could only engage it when at a standstill, but I quickly learned how to “double de-clutch”, which meant I could engage first while still moving.
~ ~ The turning circle was truly remarkable, (25 feet) which made parking and getting out of tight spaces very easy. But you had to be careful, as when you had the steering at full lock, the front wheels were quite literally at almost a 90- degree angle to the rest of the car, which meant it was very easy to damage either the tyres or the suspension if you applied too much throttle. The steering was light and easy to handle, (rack and pinion) which was important in the days before power steering became standard on all cars. The brakes were excellent, and could stop you very quickly, with disc brakes on the front wheels (unusual at this time) and drum brakes on the rear. Again, you had to take care when braking in the wet, as the front wheels had a bad habit of “locking” if you pressed the pedal to fiercely, and (once again) you would end up in a skid! (No anti-lock braking systems in these days!)
~ ~The Herald had no little luxuries in the interior like we have grown to take for granted these days. Basic “plastic” seats, (although they were comfortable enough) winders for the windows, and a manual choke (remember those?) that you had to handle with care on a cold winter’s morning if you didn’t want to flood the engine. The heater was efficient enough, and I added one of those “stick-on” rear heated windscreens. You had to dip your headlights by pressing on a knob on the floor, just to the side of the clutch. The rear view mirrors were the metal “stick-on” variety that protruded from the front wings. Room was ample enough in the front, but fairly cramped in the rear. With three adults in the back, you didn’t have room to squeeze in a sardine, and the car used to nearly sit all the way down on its springs, with the bodywork occasionally hitting of the tyres if you went over a bump too quickly. Only two doors, so if a rear seat passenger wanted out, then the front seat passenger or driver had to move first. Boot space was ample, with enough room for about one large and one small suitcase. But I never had any problems fitting in my golf clubs and caddy car! Early models had a plethora of hard plastic around the dashboard, but by the time the 12/50 was introduced Triumph had added an attractive “wood veneer” (plastic wood) dash and gear knob.
~ ~ My father bought this car new in 1966, and kept it until 1969, when he sold it on to me. I kept it for a couple of years, until I moved into the sales world, and was given company cars. If memory serves, the new price was about £700, and I paid my dad £380 for it three years later, eventually selling it on myself for £250. The Herald will always hold happy memories for the mad cabbie, as it was only the second car I actually owned. (The first was an old Wolesley 15/60) And it was the car in which I learned many of the driving skills that have stood me in good stead throughout the rest of my life.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Copyright KenJ December 2003
~~~~~~~~~~~~
FOOTNOTE. I conducted a search of the “Autotrader” website to see if any Heralds were listed for sale, but the model isn’t even listed. They can still be got though, and are a popular choice with “classic car” enthusiasts these days. If you were interested in buying one, a trawl through the many “Triumph” enthusiast websites on the web would probably yield results.
Advantages: Ease of maintenance. Running costs. Quite advanced in many ways Disadvantages: Strange mixture of old and new ideas. 'Odd' cornering to say the least
...five year old low-ish mileage Triumph Herald 12/50. Lovely it looked too, in that classy royal blue of the day touched off by those white rubber strakes that were the forerunners of today’s plastic bumpers. I’d read up a lot on the subject (yes even before Ciao), and was impressed by the fact that this range of Triumphs, i.e. Heralds, Spitfires and Vitesses all still had a chassis when everyone else had succumbed to monocoque (one piece body) construction.
... ...feeling’ that gave so many Triumph owners 'kittens' when it first happened. I purchased a flexible bar, which was on unofficial add-on to the rear suspension. This discouraged the rear wheels rushing to meet each other without stiffening the ride, and was a vast improvement. Having said that, the relatively soft ride gave back seat passengers a pleasant surprise (at least until you cornered anyway). This handling flaw, with wheels at alarming angles ...
BNibbles 11.05.2004 (12.05.2004)
· Read full review
Ciao members have rated this car review on average: very helpful Review of Triumph Herald
Value for Money
Road Handling
Comfort
Fuel consumption
Looks
Similar reviews »
Reviews which might be of interest for "Triumph Herald"
Advantages: relieve boredom Disadvantages: could cause one too many distractions
favourite used to be spot the funny foreign-made car. Now's it spot the funny British-made car, or spot the foreign-made car with a relatively large input of British components and labour. If you live in the south-east another excellent game is spot the piece of road without a car on it.
Road atlases come into their own on long journeys, which is why it's sensible not to keep them in the boot. Over the years manufacturers of road atlases have been involved in a size war with the result that an open road atlas is now the same width as your windscreen. On the other hand you have to beware of much smaller, hard-back road atlases that came from your grandmother's TriumphHerald. They're much handier but they don't have any motorways in them and all the roads lead to Stonehenge. ...
joeyhey2007 30.01.2009
· Read full review
Ciao members have rated this car review on average: very helpful Review of Car Safety
Advantages: Reliable, good ride for long distances. Disadvantages: Styling, what styling? A maiden aunt's car
't stalled it when you’re playing the stereo.
Opening the bonnet lid reveals a reasonably accessible layout, and the rocker box cover proudly proclaims “Dual Overhead Camshaft 16 valve” – if I’d had that on my first 1 litre car, a TriumphHerald, I’d have thought I’d bought a sports car. These days, it’s more to do with engine efficiency.
The GX version has a sensible but not overwhelming list of extras, central locking, a factory-fit tilt or slide sun roof, a decent Nissan-badged Blaupunkt 4-speaker stereo with “tweeters” in the front window pillars (well, it was, but it chose to pack up just outside of the 3-year guarantee period – wonderful, not), rear wash-wipe, remote headlights-leveller (important with a small car where four passengers can add 60% to the weight ...
BNibbles 23.11.2000 (30.10.2001)
· Read full review
Ciao members have rated this car review on average: very helpful Review of Nissan Micra 1.0
Advantages: Great fun to drive Disadvantages: VERY basic motoring
~ ~ Triumph was an old, indigenous UK car manufacturer who later went on to become part of the British Leyland Group of companies, back in the (good old?) days when there was still such a thing as an indigenous UK car manufacturer.
They were well made motorcars, and in fact I passed my driving test in an old TriumphHerald 12/50 way back in 1968. Maybe that's why I've always had a wee bit of a soft spot for them.
~ ~ Triumph were also renowned as manufacturers of sports cars, the best known of which were probably the Triumph Spitfire, the Triumph GT6, the Triumph Stag, and two later models, the Triumph TR6 and TR7.
I owned a Spitfire for a short period in the early 1970's, when I still considered myself a wee bit of a "jack the lad", and wanted to cut a bit of a dash with the ladies.
It was a 1969 Mark Two model, with a 1600cc twin ...
the_mad_cabbie 28.11.2003
· Read full review
Ciao members have rated this car review on average: very helpful Review of Triumph Spitfire