Home > Search results for "amd opteron 246 / 2 ghz processor"
|
Search results for "amd opteron 246 / 2 ghz processor". Item 1 to 3 out of 3 |
|
sort by Popularity | Date |
|
Search results for "amd opteron 246 / 2 ghz processor". Item 1 to 3 out of 3 |
|
|
Reviews of amd opteron 246 / 2 ghz processor
AMD XP 3200+ enters AMD into the 400Mhz arena
Review of AMD Athlon XP 3200+ / 2.2 GHz processor by
Ecosimon
Advantages: A worthy cheaper rival to Pentium 4
Disadvantages: The AMD heatsink and fan is not good enough, and hard to attach to the motherboard
..., the AMD XP 3200+ is a 400mhz processor so your processor frequency should be set at 200, this is automatically done with some motherboards or you will have to change the jumper setting manually.
Though the core clock speed is set at 2.2Ghz on the AMD XP3200+, with the advanced instruction set contained on the Barton core, this means the AMD XP 3200+ processor is comparable in speed and performance to a Pentium 4 running at 3.2Ghz, hence the XP3200+.
The AMD XP3200+ now includes 3DNow! Professional Technology which further enhances your 3D gaming experience, offering faster access to the processor while playing labour intensive 3D games. Already packed with 3DNow! Advanced Technology (contained on previous processor versions) this added feature will give yet another added bonus when playing games.
The AMD XP3200+ comes with a generic heatsink...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
23.01.2005
|
Don't live in the past
Review of Cyrix, Intel & AMD - CPU war by
cjkace
Advantages: Low prices
Disadvantages: -
...Processor speeds have accelerated at their greatest rates over the last twelve months, with AMD hitting the 1 Gigahertz mark first, but Intel hitting the 2 Gigahertz ahead. Poor old Cyrix (now owned by Via Technologies) were left far, far behind.
In terms of market, Cyrix are aiming at the ultra low end and embedded systems, leaving AMD and Intel to fight out the desktop and server market. AMD can claim to have captured a large percentage of the desktop market especially at the budget end and mid-range, while Intel seem to be left with the top end and the server market.
Unfortunately for AMD, Intel hit the 'magic' 2 Gigahertz first, while AMD could 'only' manage 1.6Ghz, which prompted AMD to re-name their processors and bring back the infamous PR (Performance Rating), something which Cyrix first introduced some years back...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
08.12.2001
|
amd chip
Review of AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ / 2.3 GHz processor by
benweale
Advantages: fast, cheap
Disadvantages: none
...this chip is such good value, just built a new computer using this one, much faster than a 2 year old amd, runs cold, dual core.
why pay for much more expensive chips when this one is does it all.
comes with its own heatsink and fan, so easy to install its not big once its all assembled.
i much prefer amd over intel as they perform better for the price, its easy to find motherboards that support these, that is the problem with older models that they become non supported really quickly so you are forced to upgrade everything at once, but i cant belive the difference that it makes when opening lots of files open and using it for photo editing.
buy it...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
23.10.2007
|
AMD Duron kicks butt
Review of AMD Duron by
Kinny
Advantages: Duron is good for value.
Disadvantages: It has none.
...be to buy a Duron. You may want to buy a different processor, but why??? The AMD Thunderbird is only slightly better than the Duron in some aspects and also it is a lot more expensive than the Duron. Celeron as i have said are a waste of money as they as just purely crap. right, back to the mainstream of things, you could go and spend a lot of money on a PIII but why, the PIII is only good at over the 1GHz mark anything before it is ruled by the AMD family of processors so i don't recommend it. So overall for people thinking about upgrading, i highly recommnd the AMD Duron, it's good for value, i mean it's damn good for value, it's better tahn the Celeron and it's also very overclockable. For overclocking, i would look into it and buy a motherboard that will allow you to adjust certain things so you can't just go skimpy on the motherrboard. Atthe...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
18.01.2001
|
AMD Duron- the best prozessor
Review of AMD Duron by
fabs-online
Advantages: he is very fast
Disadvantages: there arn't thinks
...be to buy a Duron. You may want to buy a different processor, but why??? The AMD Thunderbird is only slightly better than the Duron in some aspects and also it is a lot more expensive than the Duron. Celeron as i have said are a waste of money as they as just purely crap. right, back to the mainstream of things, you could go and spend a lot of money on a PIII but why, the PIII is only good at over the 1GHz mark anything before it is ruled by the AMD family of processors so i don't recommend it. So overall for people thinking about upgrading, i highly recommnd the AMD Duron, it's good for value, i mean it's damn good for value, it's better tahn the Celeron and it's also very overclockable. For overclocking, i would look into it and buy a motherboard that will allow you to adjust certain things so you can't just go skimpy on the motherrboard. Atthe...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
07.02.2001
|
Do it with AMD!
Review of AMD Sempron 2400+ / 1.66 GHz processor by
rally1998
Advantages: Cheap, Reliable, AMD
Disadvantages: Slowish compared to better CPUs
...becausw of the lower clock speed! this is why we get AMD Sempron 2800+ with a clock speed of 1.66ghz, The 2800+ merely indicates that this would outperform (hence the (+) at the end of the figures) an equivalent processor running at 2.8ghz.
These rpcoessors are plug in and play, simply drop the processor into the socket, pull down the lever and clip on the heatsink and fan and there it is! Instructions do come with these processors if you buy the Retail Pack, the instructions have full colour step by step guides, you can;t go wrong!
Intel are mass marketed and mainstream, TV adverts the lot, AMD....no, AMD processors are bought, used by people who are in the know how and don't need to rely on mass marketing schemes.
This processor in particular is very nice. at 1.66ghz and 2800+ it allows applications to open and run rather quickly...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
10.04.2006
|
AMD have done it again
Review of AMD Athlon 64 3000+ / 1.8 GHz processor by
bigdavep
Advantages: Warranty, Easy Install, Very Quick, Inexpensive, Overclockable
Disadvantages: Can't think of any
...will hear about in a bit) and quieter than most mainstream heatsinks.
The installation is simple enough as thet provide a foldout leaflet with step by step instructions with photos and in different languages. Simply pop the processor in the correct way round, clamp it in, hook over both ends of the heatsink and flip the lever over and lock to firmly affix the heatsink, thats it!!!!
Now I mentioned about how good the heatsink is with cooling, thats not the half of it. The processor itself is very overclockable. At correct settings it runs at 1.8GHz. A chap on gladiators forums posted, with a CPU-Z screenshot how he clocked the core speed up to 2.5GHz (yes thats an extra 700MHz) on the original packaged AMD heatsink, no water cooling, no special thermal past other than what was on the original heatsink and the heatsink is still cold enough...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
09.01.2005
|
Celeron 533mhz - not recomended
Review of Intel Celeron 1 GHz processor by
Neil2k
Advantages: Cheap processor
Disadvantages: Slow, small cache,
...I have mixed experiences with these processors, In comparison to AMD's chips, Im afraid Celeron processors do not compare.
My AMD K6-2/450 which worked without fault, was sold and replaced with a Celeron 533Mhz which at the time was of similar cost. Celeron processors were at the time rated quite highly however in comparison to AMD's 450, Graphical benchmarks, Gameplay, High Quality Video files, processor benchmarks all showed a great deal of a decrease in performance with the celeron.
The Celeron runs on a 66mhz bus speed which greatly reduces performance in comparison to processors running at 100mhz bus.
Celeron processors are known for thier ability to be overclocked which can greatly improve performance however this greatly dependant on which mainboard you choose.
Increasing the Memory from 64mb to 128mb made a noticable...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
22.12.2000
|
Cool n' Quiet - Hear it n' Believe it
Review of AMD Athlon 64 3400+ / 2.2 GHz processor by
Darkle
Advantages: Cool Quiet and fast
Disadvantages: about to be changed
...with the side panel off. The fan is controlled through the bios, so it will frequently stop for 2 and 3 minutes at a time! Then maybe only come on for a minute or so to cool off. This is really a brilliant piece of engineering, AMD have heard the cries of the modern market, and responded perfectly.
I’ve talked briefly about the power these processors have, let me expand on this. Although this is called the AMD 64 3400, it actually runs at 2.2ghz. Many people used to simply look at the MHz rating of a processor and decide on that, but there is much more to it than this. If AMD had simply posted the true speed of the processors, they would have seemed inferior to Intel, because at the moment there’s nothing from AMD above the 2.4 GHz mark(2400MHz). Yet this processor really challenges the top Intel processors. If you consider...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
20.06.2004
|
Cool n' Quiet, hear it n' Believe it
Review of AMD Athlon 64 3400+ / 2.2 GHz processor by
Darkle
Advantages: Cool, quiet and powerful
Disadvantages: soon to be replaced
...with the side panel off. The fan is controlled through the bios, so it will frequently stop for 2 and 3 minutes at a time! Then maybe only come on for a minute or so to cool off. This is really a brilliant piece of engineering, AMD have heard the cries of the modern market, and responded perfectly.
I’ve talked briefly about the power these processors have, let me expand on this. Although this is called the AMD 64 3400, it actually runs at 2.2ghz. Many people used to simply look at the MHz rating of a processor and decide on that, but there is much more to it than this. If AMD had simply posted the true speed of the processors, they would have seemed inferior to Intel, because at the moment there’s nothing from AMD above the 2.4 GHz mark(2400MHz). Yet this processor really challenges the top Intel processors. If you consider...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
20.06.2004
|
Haven´t found the product you´re looking for? Please look for it in Advanced Search
|
|
|