Home > Search results for "intel dual-core 3.2 ghz processor"
Filter search results
by Category
|
Search results for "intel dual-core 3.2 ghz processor". Item 1 to 20 out of 34 |
Page 1 2 |
sort by Popularity | Date |
|
Search results for "intel dual-core 3.2 ghz processor". Item 1 to 20 out of 34 |
Page 1 2 |
Next page |
Search results in online shops
|
Search results for "intel dual-core 3.2 ghz processor". Item 1 to 5 out of 5 |
|
sorted by Popularity |
|
Search results for "intel dual-core 3.2 ghz processor". Item 1 to 5 out of 5 |
|
|
Reviews of intel dual-core 3.2 ghz processor
Intel Dual-Core Xeon 5130 / 2 GHz processor
Review of Intel Dual-Core Xeon 5130 / 2 GHz processor by
owais997
Advantages: ideal for intense computing environments
Disadvantages: none
...Very good Speed and unbelieveable performance and The Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 5100 series is ideal for intense computing environments, 32-bit and 64-bit business-critical applications and high-end workstation and Analysis in my mind Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 5100 series-based platforms are expected to deliver up to 2.25 times the performance and 2.35 times the performance/watt of previous-generation dual-core Intel Xeon processors and realiable performance and I always advice my friends,visiter and colike. In my view overall good performance Easily purchase. Good Manufacture support and overall we see performance,efficiency,design very valuable. Mostly people perfer and All this report in my survey and judge 80% people perfer this and I also recommend you please purchase....
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
24.07.2008
|
Intel's Core 2 Duo E6300
Review of Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 / 1.86 GHz processor by
nickrein
Advantages: Fast, Dual-Core, Overclockable, Great for Gaming
Disadvantages: Price?
...This is an excellent processor from Intel. It is using the new Core 2 Duo technology. This is a dual-core, meaning that it can preform multiple functions, such as browsing the web and listening to music while burning a cd, very well.
This is one of the less expensive processors from the new line. However, I have found it to be the the processor that has the best value. It is an excellent buy and is strongly recommended for all new computers that can afford to spend this much on a processor.
For those interested in overclocking, it offers unbeatable potential. A huge overclock, meaning about 3.2 ghz, is not uncommon or particularly hard to reach with quality components. Please note that this voids your guarantee however.
This is also perfect for gaming. With this, one core can handle background applications, such as winamp or even...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
21.03.2007
|
Overclockable Beast, Large Cache, Dual Core
Review of Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 / 2.4 GHz processor by
frozenace
Advantages: High overclocking margin, runs cool, good value
Disadvantages: If you give it too much VCore, performance degrades
...The Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 Boxed processor is my first try at the world of dual-core (and eventually multi-core) processing. After building my computer consisting of the Intel processor, EVGA nForce 680i SLI motherboard and EVGA 8800 GTX graphics card, topped up with 2 GB of Corsair XMS2 8500 RAM, I was ready to make another attempt at overclocking.
Immediately after purchasing the CPU, I bought a cheap heatpipe fan solution, which didn't keep the CPU cool enough, when running above 3.15 GHz, so I had to upgrade to a Zalman Copper fan later on, which cost around 35 pounds.
The CPU now runs at 3.2 GHz, which is by no means a record, but it is enough and the fan is really quiet, so I can leave it running even when I am sleeping (leaving it to crunch some data).
The 4MB cache makes sure that there is a nice buffer of data for the ALUs...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
11.07.2007
|
AMD Phenom 9500 / 2.2 GHz processor
Review of AMD Phenom 9500 / 2.2 GHz processor by
shivendu
Advantages: quad-core design handles data efficiently; cheaper than competing Intel quad-core chips.
Disadvantages: Expensive
...The good: "True" quad-core design handles data efficiently; cheaper than competing Intel quad-core chips.
The bad: Not fast enough to justify the price savings compared to Intel's chips; next-gen Intel quad-core due out soon could further the performance gap.
The bottom line: AMD's new Phenom quad-core CPU has little to recommend it over competing chips from Intel. The Phenom is marginally less expensive, but not enough to make up for its subpar performance. Unless AMD drops prices more aggressively, it looks like Intel will maintain its grasp on the CPU market for the foreseeable future.
For raw performance, AMD's Athlon 64 X2 chips have lingered behind their Intel Core 2 Duo counterparts all year. Only aggressive pricing from AMD kept its old dual-core CPUs in systems and on store shelves. According to our testing, AMD will have...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
18.03.2008
|
HP compaq business desktop
Review of HP Compaq Business Desktop dx2300 - Pentium D 925 3 GHz by
pfc1010
Advantages: easy to use, the price
Disadvantages: no monitor
...In my experience this HP compaq bussiness desktop DX2300-pentium D 952 3 GHz was desighed specifically for bussinesses with essential computing needs, the HP compaq dx2300 microtower comes with practial features and award-winning HP support, so you can focus on your business instead of worry about your PC.
The reliability of the machine seems superb, I've never seen any problems with it at all, then again if you did HP are well known for there good customer support and excellently detailed manuals.
Main Specification
- Windows vista premium ready
- Processor: 1 x intel pentium D 925 / 3 GHz (dual-core)
- Cache memory: 4 MB L2 cache
- Cache per processor: 4 MB (2 x 2 MB)
- RAM: 1 GB (installed) / 2 GB max
- Hard drive: 1 x 160 GB - standard - serial ATA-300
- Graphics controller: Intel GMA 3000
- Audio output: Sound card - stereo
- OS...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
22.06.2007
|
Pentium D, Just do It!!
Review of Intel Pentium D 945 / 3.4 GHz processor by
pfishers
Advantages: Dual Core, Fast Clock Speed, Overclocking, 4mb cach
Disadvantages: slower than the newer core 2 duo range
...I have had this processor for almost a year now, the price i paid at purchase was around £99. I have had no problems with the processor and it has worked well for me.
I have this processor installed in the following rig and it has worked great for both gaming and work based activity.
Rig:
Processor: Intel Pentium D 945 / 3.4 GHz processor (This one)
MotherBoard: Asus P5N32-SLI SE Deluxe
Ram: 3GB (3x1GB Sticks)
Graphics: Nvidia 7600GT 256mb
HDD: 2x250GB and a 160gb (all SATAII)
Disk Drives: DVD-RW (Dual Layer)
I use this system for gaming and the processor has done a very good job of playing games, Ripping and Burning music and movies and a lot of Compression and De-Compression.
Processor Specs:
Processor Type: Intel Pentium D 945
Clock Speed: 3.4 GHz
Bus Speed: 800 MHz
Cache...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
08.08.2007
|
Intel 541 Review
Review of Intel Pentium 4 541 / 3.2 GHz processor by
robump
Advantages: Great Price, Value for money
Disadvantages: It is not dual core, Single core processors are becoming out dated
...I have used this processor in my media centre when i built it up. I feel that it is excellent value for money. It comes with everything you need for you to install it into a lga 775 socket, the fan and heatsink already come supplied with thermal paste applied. It is very easy to install into a socket 775 and uses conductive pads instead of the old pins. I would say it took me about 15mins to install mine and it works brilliantly. It runs at an average temperature of about (34 degrees celcius) this really depends on how much other cooling you have in your case. This processor uses intels hyper threading technology which helps it along when you are doing very processor intensive tasks e.g. video encoding. This processor runs very stable at 3.2 ghz and I have not tried overclocking it yet as i have no need for a media centre. I have...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
26.01.2007
|
Speedy little core(s)
Review of AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ / 3 GHz processor by
paulhanton
Advantages: Cheap, fast, reliable
Disadvantages: Can't see any
...I bought this processor, new motherboard, new video card and windows vista home premium to upgrade my old PC which my son now uses for gaming. I may review the motherboard etc. later.
I researched this processor on the web first, and decided on this based on comparing prices and performance with what I need, rather than what I might want, and it does all I need.
Essentially the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is simply two cores (processors)at 3GHz with 1MB of L2 cache per core. This means that you are getting a pretty fast processor which, although launched nearly a year ago, still runs all known games as far as I am aware.
AMD have a pretty comprehensive website where anyone that has a technical mind (I am not that way inclined) can get info' to their hearts desire, the essential info listed is below:
Processor AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 Dual-Core...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
21.10.2007
|
Best Value Processor On The Market
Review of Intel Pentium Dual Core E2160 / 1.8 GHz processor by
Wickentree
Advantages: Value for money, Performance, Easy to install
Disadvantages: Small 1MB L2 Cache, Instructions are a little lacking
... Performance
I thought that it would be best to talk out the performance of the processor first since this is what everybody is looking for with games and application becoming more demanding. The performance of the E2160 out of the box is quite slow at only 1.8GHz but this is where the beauty of this processor comes in, it is highly overclockable, I have mine running at 3.2ghz and it doesn't go above 60 degrees C. The small 1MB L2 Cache does let it down slightly compared to some of the more expensive reviews but this CPU has amazing performance for its price.
Price
For its price this CPU is outstanding, I got mine for just under £50 and 3.2ghz from a £50 processor is just brilliant in my opinion, even some of the more expensive processors don't get these sort of speeds. This is bar far one of the best value processors...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
03.04.2008
|
Pure AMD Class!
Review of AMD Athlon 64 3000+ / 2 GHz processor by
haydox
Advantages: Fast, Cheap, 64-bit, so much better than an Intel!
Disadvantages: Lack of 64-bit programs out
...First Things First....this processor is actually called an AMD Athlon64 3000+, which means that it is the equivalent to an Intel 3Ghz. But it is called here a 2Ghz because AMD are better than Intel and their processors can handle more information, so can be slower, and therefore cooler. (e.g. a 2Ghz AMD is the same as a 3Ghz Intel!).
Now to the review, i bought this processor because i needed a new one badly and this was faster, had a bigger cache and was 64-bit, then i saw the price and my jaw literally dropped, i couldn't believe it!
I installed this processor fine first time, no hassle (though i would recomment removing the thermal compound on the supplied heatsink and using Arctic SIlver instead) and it works like a dream, even though it is the lower end of the Athlon64 market! As well as working fine it can also be overclocked...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
21.02.2006
|
Haven´t found the product you´re looking for? Please look for it in Advanced Search
|
|
|