Home > Cars & Motorcycles > Running A Car > Warranty Companies
Great Customer Service but poor/inconsistent claims handling 2 of 2 Ciao Users found the following review helpful
Rating from mm3973 2 Stars ()

Advantages Professional customer service

Disadvantages inconsistent claims handling

The following is my opinion and/or personal experience of Warranty Direct.

I purchased the 'extensive' extra care warranty from WD approx 6 months ago, at a cost of around £300 pa. (with wear & tear from inception) The vehicle has been subject to a major service at Main Dealer the day before inception.

SALES & ADMINISTRATION:
Sales and adminstration at the point of sale were both first class - no complaints.

CLAIMS HANDLING:
Recently I noted a problem with the flywheel and contacted WD for guidance, first problem was an outdated list of network approved garages; of the three provided in my area - one was a body repair shop, one was closed down and the other didnt provide loan cars. Luckily I had paid the extra premium and was able to take the car to a garage of my choice. My local main again was able to accept the vehicle and provide a loan car, however, this did mean that I would have to pay the hefty bill upfront and then recover from WD.

In addition to the flywheel, the garage noted two other problems - a leaking ladder frame (excluded from cover) and a leaking steering rack (insured component). The car was with the garage for a week before WD's instructed assesors report became available.

FLYWHEEL - Claim authorised 100% perfect in this aspect of the claim.

LADDER FRAME - ( This is a leak not requiring removal of the engine, just the rocker box and is therefore excluded from the policy) - Claim refused, this was anticipated and a clear exclusion so completely fair.

STEERING RACK - Mechanic describes as heavy leak (supported by need to top up fluids regularly) WD inspection describes as 'misting' - i.e. slight leak, as such this is not considered a failed component by them (despite no definition being listed in the T&Cs) - Claim refused until such time as the part fails completeley.

In my opion the handling of items 1 & 2 was fair, the steering rack however, I felt completely unreasonable - this item is not designed to leak or mist, it is therefore a failed part. I am currently pursuing their inhouse 8 week complaint procedure.

Rate this User Review

How helpful was this review to you? Rating guidelines

Attention, this is the first review from this author

Instead of giving a negative rating, consider:

  • Help this member by giving your advice

  • Report fraud (for example plagiarism) or other issue with the review to the Ciao support team

Activate low rating buttons

Add your comment

 Post comment  Post comment

JavaScript should be enabled to rate or post a comment.

Comments

Maybe you have a question about warrantydirect.co.uk? Ask here
Previous page Next page Page 1 of 1 | 1 - 2 out of 2 comments
Previous page Next page Page 1 of 1 | 1 - 2 out of 2 comments

More reviews

for warrantydirect.co.uk